| |
| |
FindLaw for Legal Professionals - Case Law, Federal and State Resources, Forms, and Code |
 | | The argument is that, since the railroads and the public have a common interest in the efficient performance of the whole transportation chain, it is proper and necessary to require all carriers to contribute to the cost of a plan designed to serve this end. |
 | | United States, 263 U.S., 44 S.Ct. 169, 33 A.L.R. A distinction is sought to be made because the carriers, which were required to contribute, were permitted to retain a reasonable return upon their property. |
 | | It is manifest that the list was prepared under a misapprehension of the extent of the authority of Congress with respect to employees of interstate carriers and of the application of the decision in the first Employers' Liability Cases (Howard v. |
| caselaw.lp.findlaw.com /cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=295&invol=330 (12457 words) |
|