| |
| | Palestine Monitor (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-22) |
 | | Rather than presenting the conflict as one between an “occupier” and an “occupied,” the conflict is presented as one between two equal parties with equal rights to “disputed”[iii] land that Israel “captured”[iv] in 1967. |
 | | In the case of the Palestinian Territories, however, the term “occupied” is insufficient to describe Israel’s policies of land confiscations, home demolitions, colony construction and the array of Israeli human rights violations such as torture and collective punishment imposed on the Palestinian civilian population. |
 | | Most historians, including Israeli historians, dispute Israel’s claim that its 1967 attack on Egypt, Jordan and Syria was “defensive.”[xxix] However, the point is moot for purposes of deciding whether Israel occupies the Palestinian Territories: no concept of territorial conquest, whether defensive or offensive, exists under international law. |
| www.palestinemonitor.org /nueva_web/activism/media/absence_occupation_press.htm (2709 words) |
|