| |
| | Descriptions of state gun cases |
 | | However, as to rights listed in the Constitution, like the right to free speech, or assembly, or to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, these are usually presumed to be fundamental, and are thus subject to so called "strict scrutiny" analysis. |
 | | This case was dismissed in July, 1997, after proceedings after remand, based on the parties representing to the court that a settlement had been reached, although the settlement was not presented to the court to be made an order of the court. |
 | | The court found that some of the listed weapons, even if they were really machine guns and not semi-automatic firearms, were still banned, or that the machine gun and semi-automatic version were banned by the ordinance. |
| www-2.cs.cmu.edu /afs/cs/usr/wbardwel/public/nfalist/state_cases.html (16872 words) |
|