| |
| | LINGUIST List 2.804: Names (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-06) |
 | | With reference to John Limber's query on whether names exhibit syntactic peculiarities in any languages: in the southern dialects of the Western Desert Language, Australia (Pitjantjatjara, Yankunytjatjara etc.) names have the suffix -nya in the S (intransitive subject) and O (transitive direct object) forms, and the ergative -lu in the A (transitive subject) form. |
 | | I would like comment on a bit David Gil's query (Linguist Vol-2-794) about the syntax of names and their (apparent) capacity to function as NPs without being in construction with an article, a quantifier, etc. There are, at least, two more counterexamples to this generalization we could add to the Tagalog example Gil mentions. |
 | | Of course, given this double life that languages with an Academia live, these constructions sound perfectly good both with the article and without it, which basically means that we will probably always supply an article when speaking, but we will never write such a thing. |
| www.ling.ed.ac.uk /linguist/issues/2/2-804.html (1613 words) |
|