| |
| | §1. Simon Fish. II. Reformation Literature in England. Vol. 3. Renascence and Reformation. The Cambridge History ... (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21) |
 | | On the former, we gather that Lollard works were reprinted, partly, it may be, for their supposed value, but, also, to show that the opinions held by their editors had been taught in England long before. |
 | | The Lollard literature and controversies were thus swallowed up in the reformation, and, although a lower class of writings, such as that of Fish, still continued to be written and circulated, more literary interest belongs to a theological class that followed them. |
 | | The new writings recalled, always in their exaggeration and sometimes in their violence, the old, but they were composed upon a larger scale; and the importance of single members of the class, and the numbers in which they were published, made this new movement more important than Lollardy had ever been. |
| www.bartleby.com /213/0201.html (1026 words) |
|