| |
| | R. (on the application of MANI) v LONDON BOROUGH OF LAMBETH - LONDON BOROUGH OF ENFIELD - [2002] EWHC 735 (Admin) |
 | | That is the major question raised by these three applications, which have been heard together, for judicial review of, in the first case, a decision by the London Borough of Lambeth and, in the second and third cases, decisions by the London Borough of Enfield, to refuse to provide accommodation in such circumstances. |
 | | On behalf of Westminster Mr McGuire advanced an ambitious argument that, in the light of the availability to Mrs Y-Ahmed of asylum support, it could not be said, within the meaning of section 21(1)(a), that the care and attention which she needed were “not otherwise available to” her. |
 | | Lambeth contends that Mr Mani falls within none of those categories; he contends that, as it happens, he falls within all of them. |
| www.asylumsupport.info /courtcases/manir-ewhc735.htm (6711 words) |
|