| |
| | PhyloCode Discussion - Message 2001-06-0042: Re: Subscribers (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-22) |
 | | Lophotrochozoa cannot be a paraphyletic group, because it was DEFINED as a monophyletic group (the last common ancestor of bryozoans, phoronids, brachiopods, annelids, and mollusks, and all the descendants of that common ancestor). |
 | | The discovery and definition of Lophotrochozoa preceded the definition of Ecdysozoa, and even the paper that described Ecdysozoa supported its sister-group relationship to Lophotrochozoa. |
 | | If Lophotrochozoa had been named as a ranked taxon, then all the other nearby ranks among metazoans would have had to be changed, and then changed back again if Lophotrochozoa is really found to be synonymous with Bilaterialia, as you suggest without supporting evidence. |
| phylocode.miketaylor.org.uk /archive/messages/2001-06-0042.html (638 words) |
|