| |
| | [No title] (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-11) |
 | | The fact that Einstein asserted that the Lorentz transformation equations were the basis of the special theory, and these are, of course, purely mathematical, means that, in so far as the theory is considered to have any physical implications, these implications must be the result of the interpretation of mathematical expressions in physical terms. |
 | | The Lorentz transformations have proved not to be the necessary formulation of the principle of relativity, as Poincaré believed, since physical interpretations of them have contradicted the principle. |
 | | But the Lorentz transformation equations were first derived and used by Voigt in 1887 in connection with elasticity, and later, again by Lorentz in connection with the electron theory of matter, and do not depend on 'relativity' for their derivation. |
| homepage.ntlworld.com /academ/whatswrongwithrelativity.html (4975 words) |
|