| | Debro v. The Los Angeles Raiders |
 | | The new pleading charged the Raiders and the OACCA with violating the six statutes on which the original complaint was based, including Government Code sections 12650 and 12651 of the California Act. |
 | | The alleged violation of the California Act, therefore, was the Raiders' presentation or use of the loan agreement to obtain funds, where the loan agreement falsely characterized the transaction as a loan. |
 | | Although the Raiders now chide Debro for focusing his opening brief on whether the 1995 complaint gave officials notice, his doing so is not surprising since that was precisely the argument the Raiders made in the trial court to get the demurrer sustained. |
| www.law.com /regionals/ca/opinions/oct/a094248.shtml (4229 words) |