| |
| | People v Jordan (2005 NYSlipOp 06229) (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-06) |
 | | Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court properly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to law enforcement authorities (see Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 [1966]; People v Jean, 13 AD3d 466 [2004]). |
 | | It is the defendant, not counsel on the prior matter, who decides whether or not to invoke the defendant's right to counsel (see People v Bing, supra). |
 | | Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur. |
| www.courts.state.ny.us /reporter/3dseries/2005/2005_06229.htm (297 words) |
|