Factbites
 Where results make sense
About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   PR   |   Contact us  

Topic: Major record labels


Related Topics

In the News (Fri 1 Jan 10)

  
  Record label - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Most major record labels are owned by a few large multinational companies (Big Four record labels) that make up the almost all of the global recording industry, although there is a recent resurgence in independent record labels.
Often the record label's decisions are correct ones from a commercial perspective, but this typically frustrates the artist who feels that their artwork is being destroyed.
Such labels have a reputation for being fiercely uncompromising and especially unwilling to cooperate with the Big Four record labels at all.
en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Record_label   (863 words)

  
 pcpmundo.com - Major & Indie Record Labels   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-02)
Record labels, you love'em, you hate'em, why, very simple, because they can either make you a platinum star or put you in a hell hole and leave you bankrupt....
Major labels are interested in producing hit records that will sell millions and millions of copies.
The major may have heard about the artist and about his or hers tremendous sales in the market place and may propose to buy the artist from the indie label with an offer that they can't refuse.
www.pcpmundo.com /article__02__major___indie_record_labels_   (1105 words)

  
 Record Labels *** major and independent record labels - Songtexte   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-02)
Record companies or record labels work together with various artists to help produce, promote and distribute their artwork.
Record labels enable artists to fully concentrate on their artwork and take care of everything else important in music business.
In the end the best practice is choosing one of the record labels which one has the feeling fits best his or her vision and will contribute the most.
www.recordlabels.nu   (250 words)

  
 Record Labels   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-02)
Record labels can't adopt this strategy, because their underlying business model is different.
Record labels can embrace the internet the way a soldier throws himself on a hand grenade, and they know it.
The major record labels use their control of the market not just to extract monopoly rents, but to mold the market for their own profit and convenience.
world.std.com /~swmcd/steven/stories/labels.html   (1185 words)

  
 STEVE ALBINI'S EXPOSE OF BEING SIGNED TO A MAJOR LABEL</a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> If the <b>label</b> presents them with a contract that the band don't want to sign, all the <b>label</b> has to do is wait. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Another <b>label</b> expressed interest, but when the A & R man was asked to release the band, he said he would need money or points, or possibly both, before he would consider it. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> They break the news to their current <b>label</b>, and the <b>label</b> manager says he wants them to succeed, so they have his blessing.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>www.atlantic-satellite.com /major_la.htm</font>   (2207 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><u>Downhill Battle presents the Reasons</u>   <i>(Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-02)</i></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> For decades, the <b>major</b> <b>labels</b> have controlled what's on the radio by paying radio stations to play their songs. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> The <b>major</b> <b>labels</b> use their monopoly of distribution and their control of radio to prevent independent music from competing in the mainstream. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> <b>Major</b> <b>label</b> artists only start getting their tiny share of royalties (5-10%) once they've sold over 500,000 units.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>www.downhillbattle.org /reasons</font>   (661 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><a href="http://www.musicdish.com/mag?id=6675">MusicDish Industry e-Journal</a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Absent the penalty of perjury, <b>Major</b> <b>Label</b> lawyers testified to a panel of senators in Los Angles that most artists are happy with their <b>recording</b> contracts. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> <b>Major</b> <b>Labels</b> emphasized that artists, by and large, are "happy with the current system," and based this on the fact that so few artists audit their <b>labels</b> or sue for breach of contract. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> <b>Record</b> companies claim that this standard avoids conflicts of interest, makes the audit process cheaper for the artist - as the auditor's time will be minimized - and the company's royalty accounting process will not be held up.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>www.musicdish.com /mag?id=6675</font>   (1631 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><a href="http://www.bgsu.edu/departments/tcom/faculty/ha/tcom103.sp01.gp2/page3.html">Page Title</a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> The relationship between <b>major</b> and independent <b>labels</b> is a complex one due to the various numbers of variables that each encounters when dealing with the other. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Most independent <b>labels</b> were started by people who wanted to make music that <b>major</b> <b>record</b> <b>labels</b> did not back or by people who were contemptuous of the way <b>majors</b> did business. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Nonetheless, many critics say that these <b>labels</b> are not truly independent because they depend on their parent company for finances for distribution, promotion, <b>recording</b>, marketing, etc. In other instances, an independent might just depend on a <b>major</b> for distribution instead of financial backing.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>www.bgsu.edu /departments/tcom/faculty/ha/tcom103.sp01.gp2/page3.html</font>   (479 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><a href="http://www.langston.com/Fun_People/2000/2000ADY.html">Fun_People Archive - 16 Feb - Friends don't let friends sign to major record labels.</a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> The band cannot sign to another <b>label</b> or even put out its own material unless they are released from their agreement, which never happens. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Another <b>label</b> expressed interest, but when the AandR man was asked to release the band, he said he would need money or points, or possibly both, before he would consider it. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> <b>Record</b> company: $710,000 Producer: $90,000 Manager: $51,000 Studio: $52,500 Previous <b>label</b>: $50,000 Agent: $7,500 Lawyer: $12,000 Band member net income each: $4,031.25 The band is now 1/4 of the way through its contract, has made the music industry more than 3 million dollars richer, but is in the hole $14,000 on royalties.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>www.langston.com /Fun_People/2000/2000ADY.html</font>   (2296 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><a href="http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/press_releases/2003/201946.htm">DOJ/Antitrust</a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> The <b>major</b> <b>labels</b> have now authorized a number of entities — only one of which continues to be controlled by <b>major</b> <b>record</b> <b>labels</b> — to deliver the <b>major</b> <b>labels</b>' artists' music to consumers in a variety of different forms. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> The Division initially was concerned that the licensing by the <b>major</b> <b>record</b> <b>labels</b> to their own joint ventures might provide the <b>major</b> <b>record</b> <b>labels</b> an opportunity to collectively establish the terms on which they would license to third parties. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> The Division considered in its investigation whether the <b>major</b> <b>record</b> <b>labels</b> used their joint ventures to suppress the growth of the Internet as a means of promoting and distributing music, in order to protect their present positions in the distribution of music on physical media, such as <a href="/topics/Compact-disc" title="Compact disc" class=fl>CDs</a>.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>www.usdoj.gov /atr/public/press_releases/2003/201946.htm</font>   (1906 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><a href="http://www.taxi.com/members/links-labels.html">TAXI: Major and Independent Record Labels</a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Fuzzpop <b>Records</b>: specializing in instrumental surf music and tuneful guitar pop, their aim is to keep alive the spirit of authentic 60s surf music and sugar-sweet guitar pop by releasing music from the hundreds of bands around the world that still produce this great music </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Get Real <b>Records</b> We are in the business of providing quality entertainment as well as offering an environment where an artist can feel comfortable about their careers and grow into their own <b>label</b> if they desire. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Note <b>Records</b>: promotes original music from professional musicians who are generally sidemen or session men with <b>major</b> bands, who would not normally get to <b>record</b> their music.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>www.taxi.com /members/links-labels.html</font>   (5689 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1027-997860.html">Record labels sue Napster investor | CNET News.com</a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Universal Music Group and <a href="/topics/EMI" title="EMI" class=fl>EMI</a> <b>Recorded</b> Music filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles against San Francisco-based Hummer Winblad, its cofounder John Hummer and general partner Hank Barry, who was formerly the CEO at Napster. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> The <b>record</b> <b>labels</b> are seeking punitive damages of no less than $150,000 per violation of copyright, among other awards. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> <b>Record</b> companies and music publishers have much to be concerned about, according to recent research.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>news.com.com /2100-1027-997860.html</font>   (849 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><a href="http://www.arancidamoeba.com/mrr/whatsamatador.html">major labels: what's a mata, dor?</a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Despite the nauseating proliferation of <b>major</b> label-produced "alternative" music, the attempts at commercial, co-optation of every idea and venue of legitimate resistance, and the frenzied buying-up of indie bands and <b>labels</b>, there is still honest, critical rock out there. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> But after all that, and amidst the continuing assault, bands and <b>labels</b> interested in real opposition have started up and stayed on: it is not, after all, too hard to scratch the surface of a faux-indie to find the <b>major</b> <b>label</b> hidden underneath, and Pearl Jam's utter irrelevance is obvious. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> The way we make <b>records</b> compared with the way they make <b>records</b>, ummm, the way we deal with bands, I mean, they aren't used to dealing with bands without managers and lawyers, they're not used to that kind of stuff.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>www.arancidamoeba.com /mrr/whatsamatador.html</font>   (1415 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1023-960183.html">Labels pay to settle price-fixing suit | CNET News.com</a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> The <b>major</b> <b>record</b> <b>labels</b> will pay out $67.3 million to settle a 2-year-old price-fixing lawsuit, according to state attorneys general involved in the case. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> <b>Record</b> <b>labels</b> have come under increasing scrutiny for their pricing habits, especially as the Internet has made music distribution cheaper. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> The <b>labels</b> agreed to drop the pricing agreements under a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission two years ago, but were not required to pay any money at that time and did not admit any wrongdoing then either.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>news.com.com /2100-1023-960183.html</font>   (682 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><a href="http://www.afm.org/public/musicians/recordlabels.php">Record Labels</a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> And even if your stuff is first rate, be prepared to hear a lot of "no"s from <b>record</b> <b>labels</b> and deal with rejection as well as a small return for your efforts if your <b>record</b> doesn't hit the charts. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Independent <b>record</b> <b>labels</b> have the same presence as the <b>major</b> <b>record</b> <b>labels</b> on the Net. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> For an artist to accrue the same income on a <b>major</b> <b>label</b> would require millions of <b>records</b> to be sold.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>www.afm.org /public/musicians/recordlabels.php</font>   (914 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><a href="http://betsie.tripod.com/literary/id161.html">Major Record Labels</a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Chrysalis <b>Records</b> - 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10104 </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Columbia <b>Records</b> - 550 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10022 </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Island <b>Records</b> (Polygram) - 825 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10019</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>betsie.tripod.com /literary/id161.html</font>   (374 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><a href="http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/print.php/3292801">DOJ Ends Antitrust Probe of Online Music</a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> "The Division initially was concerned that the licensing by the <b>major</b> <b>record</b> <b>labels</b> to their own joint ventures might provide the <b>major</b> <b>record</b> <b>labels</b> an opportunity to collectively establish the terms on which they would license to third parties," the DOJ statement said. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> The DOJ also considered in its investigation whether the <b>major</b> <b>record</b> <b>labels</b> used their joint ventures to suppress the growth of the Internet as a means of promoting and distributing music, in order to protect their present positions in the distribution of music on physical media such as <a href="/topics/Compact-disc" title="Compact disc" class=fl>CDs</a>. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Proceeding collectively could have allowed the <b>major</b> <b>record</b> <b>labels</b> to explore the use of the Internet to promote and distribute their music, without relinquishing control over the pace and direction of those activities.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>www.internetnews.com /bus-news/print.php/3292801</font>   (864 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><a href="http://www.mp3machine.com/news/384">Major record labels sued in USA by states - Articles @ MP3Machine</a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> The five <b>major</b> <b>recording</b> <b>labels</b> will be heading to court to defend a lawsuit filed by a coalition of US states which claim the <b>recording</b> <b>labels</b> have breached anti-trust laws. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> The <b>labels</b> claim that MAP was started in order to assist smaller music retailers compete with large stores and retail chains, who sold <a href="/topics/Compact-disc" title="Compact disc" class=fl>CDs</a> below cost in order to attract more customers into their stores. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> But the <b>labels</b> were not required to pay any damages.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>www.mp3machine.com /news/384</font>   (474 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><u>Business 2.0 - Web Guide - Music Industry: Major Record Labels -e1</u>   <i>(Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-02)</i></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> BMG owns more than 200 <b>record</b> <b>labels</b> in 54 countries, including Arista <b>Records</b>, RCA <b>Records</b>, Ariola, and Windham Hill. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> UMG's <b>labels</b> include A&M, Geffen, MCA, Universal, Interscope, Mercury, Island, Polydor, Motown and Def Jam; country music's MCA Nashville and Mercury Nashville; jazz's Verve, GRP and Impulse!; and classical's Decca, Philips and Deutsche Grammophon. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Warner Music Group's <b>record</b> <b>labels</b> include Warner Music International, Atlantic, Elektra, Rhino, London Sire <b>Records</b>, and Warner Bros. Scroll to the bottom of this linked list of AOL Time Warner companies for access.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>www.business2.com /b2/webguide/0,17811,2351,00.html</font>   (242 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><u>USATODAY.com - Record labels cut deals with file-sharing companies</u>   <i>(Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-02)</i></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> The <b>major</b> <b>record</b> <b>labels</b>, which refused initially to deal with the emerging online song file-sharing technologies, have turned over a new leaf. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Universal Music, the world's largest <b>record</b> <b>label</b>, has signed on to use his technology, and Fanning says he's in advanced discussions with other <b>labels</b>. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> He chalks up the changed attitude to recent court losses for the industry — the <b>labels</b>' lost efforts to litigate Grokster and others out of business — and the continuing popularity of file-sharing.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>www.usatoday.com /money/media/2004-12-02-record-labels-file-sharing_x.htm</font>   (504 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><a href="http://www.fleurdeson.com">Classical musicians, classical guitarists and classical composers</a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> They felt that classical musicians and classical composers of international merit needed a <b>record</b> <b>label</b> that was sympathetic to the needs of today's classical <b>recording</b> artists. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> In 1996, they established Fleur De Son Classics, which is now recognized as one of the most significant and rapidly growing <b>record</b> <b>labels</b> in America, serving as a voice for internationally acclaimed classical musicians. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> In order to compete in the classical music world with the <b>"major"</b> <b>record</b> <b>labels</b>, Fleur De Son Classics has adhered to a policy of presenting world premier or rarely-recorded repertoire.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>www.fleurdeson.com</font>   (382 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><u>[Customize.org] Message Board: boycott major record labels</u>   <i>(Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-02)</i></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> yup, most <b>major</b> <b>label</b> music sounds alike, and is overpriced, and overrated imo. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Universal, Warner, BMG, Sony, and <a href="/topics/EMI" title="EMI" class=fl>EMI</a> are the 5 <b>major</b> <b>labels</b>. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Most "indie" <b>labels</b> that recieve wide distro are under the thumb of a <b>major</b>.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>www.customize.org /forum/5873</font>   (1236 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><a href="http://hypebot.typepad.com/hypebot/major_labels">hypebot: Major Labels</a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Strong <b>record</b> from a band that may prove to be the Dead/Phish of their generation. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Only is a consumer turned detective and understood that Sony or the offending distributed <b>label</b> is in fact part of a combined Sony BMG could they find a link to help them with their rootkit problems or the recall. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Stay tuned as the <b>major</b> <b>labels</b> continue to walk into the arena of public opinion and and commit a slow form of suicide...</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>hypebot.typepad.com /hypebot/major_labels</font>   (9031 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2001/BUSINESS/06/06/napster">CNN.com - Napster faces being swallowed by major record labels - Jun. 6, 2001</a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Napster's popularity was its biggest asset — it had no revenue streams to speak of — but the latest figures show the average number of files shared among Napster users has fallen by 90 percent in the past three months. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Filtering technology had to be introduced to prevent the downloading of copyrighted material in response to litigation by the five <b>major</b> <b>record</b> <b>labels</b>. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> The <b>major</b> <b>labels</b> are also picking up the technology of companies such as Napster to introduce their own solutions.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>edition.cnn.com /2001/BUSINESS/06/06/napster</font>   (420 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><a href="http://www.rose-hulman.edu/thorn/archive/050121/frontpage/1.html">The Thorn - Glass Halo to audition before major record labels</a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> As a band, we get a far bigger kick out of a good response to an original than to a cover.” Each song the band produces is <b>recorded</b> in a home-built studio at Arnett’s house in Ohio, with the exception of the violin. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> This component is <b>recorded</b> via direct-line pickup, which translates the audio signal from Wunderlich’s violin to an amplifier. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Although smaller <b>labels</b> and larger ones each have their advantages, the members are not picky about who expresses interest in their music—they are excited just to be able to audition.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>www.rose-hulman.edu /thorn/archive/050121/frontpage/1.html</font>   (934 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/music/3372859.stm">BBC NEWS | Entertainment | Music | Consumers sue over anti-copy CDs</a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> <b>Major</b> <b>record</b> <b>labels</b> are being sued by a European consumer group over copy-protected <a href="/topics/Compact-disc" title="Compact disc" class=fl>CDs</a> that fans say are faulty. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> The copy protection technology was introduced two years ago by <b>record</b> companies who faced a sales slump and wanted to stop pirated <a href="/topics/Compact-disc" title="Compact disc" class=fl>CDs</a> reaching the fl market. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Industry observers say the lawsuit is the biggest European legal challenge yet to the music industry's practice of releasing copy-protected discs, according to the Reuters news agency.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>news.bbc.co.uk /1/hi/entertainment/music/3372859.stm</font>   (328 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><a href="http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/64361">Belgian consumer watchdog sues major record labels</a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> I assume that they've sued <b>record</b> <b>labels</b>' Belgian branch or European branch and that the matter will be handled in Belgium. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> It's about time that the <b>record</b> companies were brought to book over this as "The product must do what it is intended to do under it's usage discription and what the manufacturer claims it does" ie play music. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> But as you mentioned for Disney, the mouthpiece for the <b>major</b> <b>labels</b> is well known for the double stanard.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>forums.afterdawn.com /thread_view.cfm/64361</font>   (636 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><a href="http://www.cirpa.ca/Page.asp?PageID=122&ContentID=699">CIRPA: Three Major Record Labels License Content to New Peer-to-Peer Network</a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Three <b>major</b> <b>record</b> <b>labels</b> have agreed to licence their catalogues to a new peer-to-peer file sharing network called Peer Impact Network that is scheduled to launch in the first quarter of 2005. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> The four <b>record</b> <b>labels</b> participating in the venture are Warner Music Group, Sony BMG Music Entertainment and Universal Music Group. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> The <b>record</b> <b>labels</b> have not issued any statements regarding their participation in the project.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>www.cirpa.ca /Page.asp?PageID=122&ContentID=699</font>   (311 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><body face="Arial"> <br> <table cellpadding=0> <tr> <td>  </td> <td> <table > <tr><td> </td><td colspan=2><a href="http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?id=31563">Crusading prosecutor sets sights on major record labels</a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> The Times said the subpoenas sought copies of contracts, billing <b>records</b> and other information detailing the <b>labels</b>' ties to middlemen who pitch new <b>records</b> to radio programmers. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> Broadcasters are banned from taking cash or goods in return for playing songs, but the money <b>labels</b> pay to the middlemen has been seen as a method of circumventing that regulation. </td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> The information contained in the AFP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Agence France Presse.</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>www.turkishpress.com /news.asp?id=31563</font>   (405 words)</td></tr> </table> </td> </tr> </table><script language="JavaScript"> <!-- // This function displays the ad results. // It must be defined above the script that calls show_ads.js // to guarantee that it is defined when show_ads.js makes the call-back. function google_ad_request_done(google_ads) { // Proceed only if we have ads to display! if (google_ads.length < 1 ) return; var s = ''; // For text ads, display each ad in turn. // In this example, each ad goes in a new row in the table. if (google_ads[0].type == 'text') { for(i = 0; i < 1; ++i) { s = '<body face="Arial"><br><table cellpadding=0><tr><td>  </td><td><table ><tr><td> </td><td colspan=2>' + '<a href="' + google_ads[i].url + '" title="' + google_ads[i].visible_url + '">' + google_ads[i].line1 + '</a>  <span style="font-size:10pt">'; if (google_info.feedback_url) { s += '<a href="' + google_info.feedback_url + '" style="color:#7070F0;text-decoration:none">(Ads by Google)</a>'; } else { s += '(Ads by Google)'; } s += '</span></td></tr>' + '<tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td>' + '<a href="' + google_ads[i].url + '" title="' + google_ads[i].visible_url + '" style="text-decoration:none;">' + google_ads[i].line2 + ' ' + google_ads[i].line3 + '</a></td></tr>' + '<tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray>' + '<a href="' + google_ads[i].url + '" title="' + google_ads[i].visible_url + '" style="text-decoration:none; color:gray;">' + google_ads[i].visible_url + '</a></font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>'; d = document.getElementById('ad' + (i + 1)); d.innerHTML = s; d.style.display = 'block'; } s = ''; for(i = 1; i < google_ads.length; i++) { s += '<div class="r" style="margin-left: 14px"><table cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0><tr>' + // '<td valign=top><img src="/images/a.gif"/ style="padding-top: 3px; padding-right: 3px"></td>' + '<td ><a href="' + google_ads[i].url + '" title="' + google_ads[i].visible_url + '">' + google_ads[i].line1 + '<div style="text-decoration: none; ">' + google_ads[i].line2 + ' ' + google_ads[i].line3 + '</div></a>' + '<font color="gray"><a href="'+ google_ads[i].url + '" title="' + google_ads[i].visible_url + '" style="text-decoration:none; color:gray;">' + google_ads[i].visible_url + '</a></font>' + '</td></tr></table></div>' } d = document.getElementById('sky1'); d.innerHTML = s; if(s.length > 0) { document.getElementById('sky').style.display = 'block'; } } /* <body face="Arial"><br><table cellpadding=0><tr><td>  </td><td><table ><tr><td> </td><td colspan=2> <a href=" ### GOOGLE ADS[i] URL ### "> ### GOOGLE ADS[i] VISIBLE URL ### </a></td></tr> <tr><td valign=top><img style="margin-top:4px;" src=/images/a.gif></td><td></td><td> ### LINE 2 ###   ### LINE 3 ###</td></tr> <tr><td></td><td colspan=2><font color=gray> ### link ### </font>  (sponsored link)</td></tr> </table></td></tr></table> */ /* // For an image ad, display the image; there will be only one . if (google_ads[0].type == 'image') { s += '<tr><td align="center">' + '<a href="' + google_ads[0].url + '"style="text-decoration: none">' + '<img src="' + google_ads[0].image_url + '" height="' + google_ads[0].height + '" width="' + google_ads[0].width + '" border="0"></a></td></tr>'; } // Finish up anything that needs finishing up s += '</table>'; */ // document.write(s); return; } --> </script> <script language="JavaScript"> <!-- // This script sets the attributes for requesting ads. google_ad_client = "pub-9457578638026753"; google_max_num_ads = 6; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_output = "js"; google_ad_channel = "844964098"; google_kw_type = "broad"; google_kw = "Major record labels"; google_ad_type = "text_image"; google_image_size = "728x90"; google_encoding = "latin1"; --> </script> <script language="JavaScript" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> </script> <br> <p style="margin-left:30px;font-size:13px;"><b>Try your search on: <a href="http://www.qwika.com/find/Major record labels">Qwika</a> (all wikis)</b></p> <form action=http://www.factbites.com/search.php><table width="100%" cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 border=0><tr><td background="/images/f1.gif"><table cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 border=0 background="/images/b.gif"><tr><td><img src="/images/f2.gif" width=38 height=37 alt=" "/></td><td><table cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 border=0><tr><td><a href="/"><img src="/images/f3.gif" width=95 height=37 alt="Factbites" border=0 /></a><img src="/images/b.gif" width=15 height=1 alt=" "/></td><td valign=bottom><input type=text size=30 name=kp><img src="/images/b.gif" width=2 height=1 alt=" " /><input type=submit value="  Find »  " class=b2></td></tr></table></td></tr><tr><td> </td><td><span class=f> <a href="http://www.factbites.com/about_us.php">About us</a>   |   <a href="http://www.factbites.com/why_use_us.php">Why use us?</a>   |   <a href="http://www.factbites.com/reviews.php">Reviews</a>   |   <a href="http://www.factbites.com/press.php">Press</a>   |   <a href="http://www.factbites.com/contact_us.php">Contact us</a>   <br />Copyright © 2005-2007 www.factbites.com Usage implies agreement with <a href=http://www.factbites.com/terms_and_conditions.php>terms</a>.</span></td></tr></table><img src="/images/b.gif" width=450 height=1 alt=" " /></td></tr></table></form> <script src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js" type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> _uacct = "UA-317061-4"; urchinTracker(); </script> </body></html>