| |
| | Opinion by Anthony, Commissioner |
 | | As discussed further below, the Commission also concludes that respondents' claims that their device would make a vehicle safer and would shorten stopping distances in emergency stopping situations are unsubstantiated and that the other challenged claims are both unsubstantiated and false. |
 | | The record shows that respondents, in making their claim, relied on promotional literature from Allstate and another unspecified insurer stating that consumers could get a discount on their auto insurance if they had antilock brakes. |
 | | The Commission, therefore, has decided to make all three fencing-in provisions of the order applicable to "any braking system, accessory, or device, or any other system, accessory, or device designed to be used in, on, or in conjunction with any motor vehicle." |
| www.ftc.gov /os/1998/09/d09275opi.htm (8702 words) |
|