| |
| | [No title] (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-26) |
 | | It is for this reason that Japan claims the cession of the entire branch, all the more as this branch, having been constructed with the sole object of communication with Port Arthur, would lose its raison d'etre for Russia after the cession of the lease of the Liao-tung Peninsula to Japan. |
 | | Moreover, the cession of the railway being of the same nature as that of this lease, it should, with the consent of the Chinese Government, be made directly to Japan. |
 | | In reply to this point, the Plenipotentiaries of Russia explained that the South Manchurian Railway, though mentionned in the Convention of the 25th April, 1898, concerning the lease of Liao-tung, had nothing in common with the lease; that they were two entirely different questions; and that they should consequently be treated separately. |
| lcweb2.loc.gov /service/gc/mtfgc/0003/0310036.txt (239 words) |
|