
	Where results make sense

Topic: Marklar project

Related Topics

Manhattan Project

Open Directory Project

project management

psychological projection

projective geometry

Project for the New American Century

Human Genome Project

Mercator projection

projective space

projective plane

astral projections

In the News (Sat 13 Mar 10)

Northern Trust

Marvin Harrison

Peter Chernin

Gary Locke

Match Play

Penelope Cruz

Mickey Rourke

AR Rahman

Danny Boyle

Hugh Jackman

	Marklar: Just the facts... (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-11)
		This is demonstrated when the speaking Marklar, Marklar, simply said, "Marklar," and one particular Marklar stepped out of the crowd, knowing somehow he was the one being referenced.
		Marklar is not used as a conjunction (The grammatical relation between linguistic units (words or phrases or clauses) that are connected by a conjunction) or article (Nonfictional prose forming an independent part of a publication), nor is it normally used in the place of a pronoun, although pronouns may reference marklar.
		Marklar was also rumored to be the codename for a 2002 project at Apple Computer (additional info and facts about Apple Computer) to run Mac OS X (additional info and facts about Mac OS X) on x86 (additional info and facts about x86) PCs.
	www.absoluteastronomy.com /encyclopedia/m/ma/marklar.htm (506 words)

	Marklar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
		The word marklar is also a generic word used by the Marklars, similar to smurf.
		For some reason, the variety of meanings of marklar was no problem for the Marklars; just as humans are able to understand homophones based on context, the Marklars seemed to understand their language fine.
		Marklar is not used as a conjunction or article, nor is it normally used in the place of a pronoun, although pronouns may reference marklar.
	en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Marklar (523 words)

	Marklar (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-11)
		The word marklar stems from an alien race named the Marklars, which appeared in an episode of the animated series South Park.
		The Marklars use the word marklar as a generic word, similar to a pronoun, that can refer with specificity to any thing, place, person, idea, concept, or otherwise represent the meaning of any noun, verb, adverb, adjective or word, including proper nouns.
		Marklar was also rumored to be the codename for a 2002 project at Apple Computer to run Mac OS X on x86 PCs.
	hallencyclopedia.com /Marklar (408 words)

	Forums -> Os X For Pcs - Mac & Music (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-11)
		Marklar, Apple's project to build a version of Mac OS X for Intel processors, may be of more strategic importance to the company than had previously been thought.
		Marklar would have no such limitations built in, allowing Apple to appeal to Windows users frustrated by the restrictions on how they use their computers.
		Marklar itself is understood to be at an advanced stage of development, with builds matching those of the PowerPC OS X. Apple's bundled applications, including iTunes and iChat, have versions that run on the product.
	www.macmusic.org /agora/forums?act=ST&f=11&t=4894&lang=EN&&vRmtQjpAznOhM=1 (389 words)

	Articles - Mac OS (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-11)
		One interesting historical aspect of the classic Mac OS was a relatively unknown secret prototype Apple started work on in 1992, code-named Project Star Trek.
		The goal of this project was to create a version of Mac OS that would run on Intel-compatible x86 personal computers.
		The idea behind Marklar was to keep Mac OS X running on an alternate platform should Apple become unsatisfied with the progress of the PowerPC platform.
	www.hailstone.biz /articles/Mac_OS (2049 words)

	Neowin.net > Is there some way to run MacOSX on PC? (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-11)
		Marklar is a project that Apple have been working on for some time now, which is a version of Mac OSX for x86 CPUs.
		Will Apple ever release Marklar as a off the shelf product we could buy and use and dump Windows - well time will tell - Apples history is full of started and hardly finished projects, especially in relation towards operating systems.
		Well, Marklar is sorta of a rumor, so you're not going to get any official or reliable info on it anywhere.
	www.neowin.net /forum/lofiversion/index.php/admin/pricing/t57183.html (2484 words)

	Marklar! Marklar !
		Specifically, I have a real problem believing that the project is code-named "Marklar." (I don't have any problem believing such a project exists for several of the reasons stated by others here previously.) First of all, this project is supposed to have been in development for several years.
		Again, I don't doubt that such a project is in place; I just don't believe that Apple's using Marklar as the code name for the project.
		Whereas the term MarkLar does not appear anywhere in the public OSX interface files, the term "i386" does, and a simple content search of a Jag installation (with the developer tools installed) will reveal at least 75 hits in for that term.
	macslash.org /comments.pl?sid=02/09/01/1447201&cid=&pid=0&startat=&threshold=2&mode=nested&commentsort=0&op=Change (1148 words)

	Marklar: Insights on editing (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-11)
		The rumored project s focus was keeping a version of Mac OS X compatible with Intel s x86 line of processors...
		The project (code-named Marklar, a reference to the race of aliens on the South Park cartoons...
		And of course, quite a bit of the credit for that goes to the Marklar team for making sure the system was ready for Intel and the Xcode team for giving us the tools to make our applications work...
	videoeditingonlinux.fediting.com /marklar (981 words)

	Microsuck Forums - Marklar rumored to come out when Long Horn does (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-11)
		Marklar would look for that and possibly a few other hardware keys and would not boot otherwise.
		If Marklar is indeed real then an Apple branded PC seems to be the far most likely and less damaging option for its release.
		If the project is named after a funny south park word then maybe this is just a rumour...
	www.fuckmicrosoft.com /forums/archive/index.php/t-5310.html (1730 words)

	MacGamer Forums : OS X on intel boxes (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-11)
		There is also the Darwin project -- the cross-platform OS X BSD-based kernal -- fueling the speculation fires.
		And there have been projects at Apple to make earlier OSes (code-named "Star Trek") work on Intel, as well, but nothing has ever come of them.
		I would not be surprised if Apple is keeping a version of OS X in house that runs or mostly runs on Intel (they were to have a "Yellow Box" that ran Windows software or compiled for windows or something, after all).
	www.macgamer.com /wcgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=11&t=003988 (1294 words)

	2 Guys, a Mac, and a Website - Marklar is a Good Marklar! (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-11)
		It's not clear when project Marklar went from being a backup plan "just in case" to being the best course of action, but it definitely is the best course of action at this time.
		So let me wrap up this long winded marklar by saying that essentially, Apple's project Marklar is a good marklar, and no one should be marklar by it.
		So let me wrap up this long winded drivel by saying that essentially, Apple's project Marklar is a good plan, and no one should be upset by it.
	www.2guysamacandawebsite.com /article.php?id=705 (3102 words)

	DriverHeaven.net - View Single Post - Apple's x86 OS named, sized (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-11)
		It's long been assumed that Apple has maintained an x86-compatible version of its old NeXT OS, which these days is marketed as Mac OS X. But now a report at eWeek confirms its existence, status and staffing levels.
		Nick de Plume and Matt Rothenberg report that an x86 version of "Project Marklar" is maintained in step with the PPC versions, has around a dozen engineers, and is even feature "complete" with the 10.2 Jagwyre version.
		Marklar most likely doesn't signal a strategy shift, it simply remains prudent business sense: it helps to have a Plan B, if only to use as a bargaining counter.
	www.driverheaven.net /showpost.php?p=40730&postcount=1 (321 words)

	Simon Woodside \| Weblog \| TELL THE WORLD! I was Mr. Marklar (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-11)
		My "Secret Project" at Apple was Marklar aka OS X on x86, finally announced today!
		When I started, Marklar was relatively moribund, being nursed by a handful of Core OS engineers.
		I went on leave in fall 2001 after the WTC thing, but by the time I left the Marklar team gave a demo to something like the top 100 managers of the company with a working Marklar system complete with Finder running and a whole range of apps.
	simonwoodside.com /weblog/2005/06/06 (331 words)

	Architosh: Features > If Apple Went to Intel: Two Developers Explain Impact
		project, a project designed to allow Mac OS X and its iApps to run natively on Intel's x86 (Wintel) platform.
		Marklar has been cast as a strategic Plan B for Apple, in case the PowerPC microprocessor platform cannot keep pace with Intel's various chip lines—today consisting of its market dominant 32-bit x86 platform known as IA-32 (Intel Architecture 32-bit) and its emerging Itanium 64-bit platform (IA-64).
		Recently there has been reports of Apple's secret 'Marklar' project, an effort to bring the Mac OS X platform to x86.
	www.architosh.com /features/2003/2003-apple-intel-devtalk1.phtml (1443 words)

	OSx86 Project Forum > Marklar-Tiger.dmg (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-11)
		Ok I am installing marklar tiger patched release 1 into a SATA HD using VMware, I don't know if it's going to recognize SATA or even IDE outside VMware but right know it's working fine.
		Thanks, I already have marklar tiger.dmg nice cheksums, and I'm downloading flat img, but would be nice to read your guide.
		Well, i cand send it to you, when you want it, this explains how to install using.dmg image file and what files are required (patchs) and how to apply them, only give me your e-mail (here or in private message) and i'll send it to you.
	forum.osx86project.org /lofiversion/index.php/t4144.html (1793 words)

	TooMuchSexy.blog - Marklar
		As if we haven’t heard enough of this rumor over the past few days… According to eWeek, Apple has ported the whole of Mac OS X to the X86 architecture and is maintaining it in parallel with the PowerPC builds.
		According to the article, the x86 OS X is dubbed Marklar.
		This project is perceived as a fall-back plan in case Motorola doesn’t get it’s act together.
	www.toomuchsexy.org /index/weblog/comments/marklar (496 words)

	Bazookakate - Pink, blue, and white... it's not a fashion mistake, it's patriotic!
		Okay, just so there is no confusion, I will explain the Marklar Project.
		Supposedly, Apple has had a top-secret project to port Mac OS X to the x86 architecture (i.e.
		This is kind of similar to the Star Trek Project, which was supposed to get Mac OS 8 and 9 ported.
	www.greatestjournal.com /~bazookakate/23876.html (277 words)

	Why Marklar Makes Sense - Ambrosia Software, Inc. web board (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-11)
		posted 01-06-2003 05:34 PM Following the discovery of Project Marklar, the unreserved pursuit of putting OS X on the x86 platform, the outcry from loyal fans, zealots, and skeptics alike has been one of doubt.
		And if Apple unleashes Project Marklar on unmodified AMD chips, but forcing OS X Marklar support to be limited to AMD processors through (for example) limited driver support....
		Marklar and the AMD negotiations would then, most likely, be very specific and intimidating threats to Motorola and IBM both: get your asses in gear, or face the consequences.
	www.ambrosiasw.com /webboard/Forum64/HTML/000875.html (1295 words)

	Geek.com Geek News - Apple holding x86 version of Jaguar (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-11)
		marklar would be stupid if marklar did that.
		After all, marklar would make marklar if they called marklar marklar.
		After all, marklar is ment to be placed on every marklar.
	www.geek.com /news/geeknews/2002Sep/bma20020909016253.htm (3469 words)

	Rixstep (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-11)
		But Jobs did reveal the inner workings of the Marklar project, and in particular the key product 'Rosetta' sold by his long time buddy from NeXT.
		Following are the secret location of the Marklar group on the grounds of Apple Computer in Cupertino California and a schematic of the Pentium 4 with the embedded Rosetta technology.
		The Marklar buildings are the gay pink and purple ones in the upper left.
	rixstep.com /1/20050608,01.html (182 words)

	Letter Never Sent » Blog Archive » Project Marklar: OSX for PCs
		The project (code-named Marklar, a reference to the race of aliens on the "South Park" cartoons) has been ongoing inside Apple since the early days of its transition to the Unix-based Mac OS X in the late '90s.
		Sources said more than a dozen software engineers are tasked to Marklar, and the company's mainstream Mac OS X team is regularly asked to modify code to address bugs that crop up when compiling the OS for x86.
		Build numbers keep pace with those of their pre-release PowerPC counterparts; for example, Apple is internally running a complete, x86-compatible version of Jaguar, a k a Mac OS X 10.2, which shipped last week.
	www.letterneversent.com /index.php/archives/2002/08/31/project-marklar-osx-for-pcs (241 words)

	Slashdot \| Apple Secretly Maintaining x86 Port Of Mac OS X
		Marklar seems to be the marklar of the marklar, not just another markler off the old marklar.
		Marklar really does need to marklar another marklar maker in order to be marklar with the marklar.
		Marklar is just not marlar anymore, and this seems to be a good marklar to the marklar.
	apple.slashdot.org /apple/02/08/31/195208.shtml?tid=179 (7055 words)

	Microsuck Forums - OSX ON PC????? (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-11)
		The Marklar project is still an internal build, and Apple has not said anything about it.
		Marklar is the rumored port of OSX to the x86.
		This has not prevented OSS projects from trying to impliment a Darwin x86, Aqua, "glue" layer.
	www.fuckmicrosoft.com /forums/archive/index.php/t-5009.html (634 words)

	X on x86 development on par with PPC
		According to unnamed sources cited by eWeek, over a dozen engineers are assigned to Marklar and that the PowerPC version is regularly modified to address bugs that crop up in the x86 versions.
		Final word(s) That Apple is and has been working on an x86-compatible version of X isn''t news.
		That the effort is known internally as "Marklar" and that current builds match those of its PowerPC cousin is new information.
	www.mail-archive.com /macnews@insanely-great.com/msg00391.html (605 words)

	IGM: X on x86 development on par with PPC
		That Apple is and has been working on an x86-compatible version of X isn't news.
		The developments around the Power4 show that when Apple is looking for a way out they are not even considering their fallback plan, but instead come up with yet another fallback plan first".
		In other words the chances that this Marklar fallback plan is ever going to be exercised are pretty close to zero.
	www.insanely-great.com /news.php?id=878 (1303 words)

	Neowin.net > Mac OS x86: Marklar
		Contrary to circulating rumors, [Marklar] is not meant to be a Power PC exit strategy.
		Likely it will be released in the event that Microsoft chooses to stop developing for the Mac platform altogether.
		It's up to the person claiming Marklar exists, to prove it.
	www.neowin.net /forum/lofiversion/index.php/t171729.html (3633 words)

	OSNews.com
		Rumours of "Project Marklar" - being a full Mac OS X system and applications running on an Intel-compatible configuration - have been circulating for some time.
		A project, hidden deep within Apple's labs, silently stalking the latest Mac OS X releases...
		The suggestion that the project might be used to expand Apple's horizons beyond the Mac, rather than in spite of it, was always there, but has elevated in stature since the release of G5 PowerMacs.
	www.osnews.com /comment.php?news_id=4533&limit=no (3810 words)

	Intel CPU Could Run Macs [Archive] - OSNN Forum
		Barrett briefly described the company's Vanderpool project, a new processor design capable of supporting multiple operating systems at a processor level, rather than in emulation mode.
		Yeah, I'm still not sure if the "Marklar" project was true, or just a rumor.
		Back when the G4's were first introduced Apple started to have many issues with Motorola's progress in developing faster processors.
	forum.osnn.net /archive/index.php/t-2310.html (820 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)