Factbites
 Where results make sense
About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   PR   |   Contact us  

Topic: Martin V


Related Topics

In the News (Mon 13 Feb 12)

  
  CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Pope Martin V
Martin V therefore, proceeded slowly on his way thither, stopping for some time at Berne, Geneva, Mantua and Florence.
Martin was now able to continue on his journey to Rome, where he arrived on 28 September, 1420.
Though Martin V allowed adjustment of the temporal affairs of the Church to draw his attention from the more important duty of reforming the papal court and the clergy, still the sorry
www.newadvent.org /cathen/09725a.htm   (1256 words)

  
  Pope Martin V - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Martin V, né Oddone Colonna or Odo Colonna (1368 – February 20, 1431), pope from 1417 to 1431, was elected on St.
Martin's Day (November 11) at the Council of Constance by a conclave consisting of twenty-three cardinals and thirty delegates of the council, which after deposing John XXIII, had long experienced much perplexity from the conflicting claims of Gregory XII and Benedict XIII.
When the "nations" of the council pressed their plans for reform, Martin submitted a counter scheme, and ultimately entered into negotiations for separate concordats, for the most part vague and illusory, with Germany, England, and France.
en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Pope_Martin_V   (282 words)

  
 Martin v. State (Imber, J.) CR95-1314
Martin's wife, Wanda, testified on cross-examination that she suspected that her husband was smoking crack cocaine on the night of the murder, and that they had previously experienced marital difficulties due to his use of the substance.
In addition, Martin's wife testified that she suspected that Martin was using crack cocaine on April 22, and that they had previously encountered marital difficulties due to his use of the substance.
As to the admissibility of Martin's taped statement, we have already concluded that it is merely duplicative of the witnesses' testimony regarding Martin's alibi, his prior use of drugs, and his use of crack cocaine on the night of the murder.
courts.state.ar.us /opinions/1997a/970505/cr951314.html   (6403 words)

  
 Martin v. Szeto
Martin opposed the motion, arguing that section 1021.7 applied only to actions against peace officers brought in bad faith and that even if it applied to private defamation actions, appellants failed to show the action was maintained in bad faith.
Martin argues that the trial court' s denial of appellants' motion for sanctions based on his failure to attend the arbitration indicates that his failure to attend was not in bad faith.
While Martin claimed in the motion papers he filed in opposition to appellants' motion for fees that a crucial witness died prior to the hearing on the summary judgment motion, he did not file a declaration under oath on this fact and there is nothing in the record documenting it.
www.law.com /regionals/ca/opinions/supremecourt/appeal00/a094405.shtml   (2201 words)

  
 03-7113 -- Martin v. Barnhart -- 03/02/2005
Martin alleges disability as of February 8, 1998, based on osteoarthritis (causing pains in his knees, hands, elbows, and back), hypertension, depression, and congestive heart failure (with chest pains and shortness of breath).
Martin testified that he was fifty-eight years old and that his past relevant jobs were hog farmer and industrial radiographer X-ray technician.
Martin's treating and consulting physicians have observed his knee difficulties and minimally decreased range of motion in his spine due to stiffness.
www.kscourts.org /ca10/cases/2005/03/03-7113.htm   (1302 words)

  
 Martin Sexton
Martin's classic holiday album is a must have for this festive season.
XM15 The Village will be re-broadcasting an acoustic performance from Martin and the band, Today, Thursday August 30th, at 4pm...
There are a few tickets left for Martin's September 2nd show in the Hamptons.
www.martinsexton.com   (333 words)

  
 Martin v. PGA Tour, Inc.
Martin opposed the motion, and filed a motion for partial summary judgment on the same issues (R. On January 30, 1998, the district court issued a decision, denying the PGA Tour's motion for summary judgment, and granting Martin's motion in part.
Martin also alleged that defendant violated Title III because the qualifying competitions constitute "examinations or courses" under 42 U.S.C. 12189 (requiring "examinations or courses" for professional purposes to be offered in a manner accessible to persons with disabilities) (R. 1 at 4).
On December 19, 1997, Martin filed an amended complaint, adding a new claim that the PGA violated Title I of the ADA (the employment discrimination provisions) because Martin was an applicant or employee under that Title (R. 13 at 8-9).
www.usdoj.gov /crt/briefs/martin.htm   (8390 words)

  
 Martin v. Richey   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-27)
Martin also asked that Dr. Richey call her when he returned to the office because she had some questions about the mammogram and the biopsy procedure.
Martin testified that Dr. Richey did not inform her that, even if the results of the needle biopsy were negative for malignancy, there would be a need for further follow-up with Dr. Topolgus.
Nevertheless, according to Martin, Dr. Richey informed her that he was able to aspirate a small amount of fluid from the solid mass and did not tell her that the aspirate could have come from the surrounding tissue rather than the mass itself.
lw.bna.com /lw/19990803/53s04.htm   (6442 words)

  
 [No title]
Martin, Bedard sought to recover (1) the difference between the $12,000 he had received from the insurer and the $40,000 he had to pay for the property, (2) interest on the $12,000 purchase price, under various theories, and (3) attorney fees.
Martin to the extent of the insurance company’s payment, and having been compensated in an amount equal to the purchase price, Bedard may not maintain a separate action to recover (1) interest, (2) the additional money paid to the true owner of the property, or (3) mesne profits.
Martin argues that she is entitled to her attorney fees incurred both in the trial court and on appeal.
www.courts.state.co.us /coa/opinion/2004q3/03CA0813.doc   (3538 words)

  
 Willamette Week - Casey Martin v. PGA - Feb. 18, 1998
Martin's legal victory, which is being appealed, could help enshrine in law, and in public consciousness, a principle that seems obvious yet has been largely untested in courts: Society should consider the needs of individuals when deciding how to accommodate people with disabilities.
But Martin achieved membership by birthright, when he was born with a rare degenerative circulatory disorder that shoots searing pain up his leg with every step.
Martin proved that a cart was a reasonable accommodation by showing how the PGA used carts in other competitions that are not part of the PGA Tour.
www.wweek.com /html/reasonable021898.html   (994 words)

  
 No. 04-1140:Martin v. Franklin Capital - Amicus (Merits)
Even when it is neither a party nor representing a party, the United States may nonetheless have a substantial interest in the removal to federal court of cases involving issues of importance to the federal government, including those raising unsettled juris dictional questions.
Franklin Capital Corp., 251 F.3d 1284 (2001) (Martin I); see J.A. The court held that the claim for treble damages applied to only one state statute, under which the specific damages recoverable were uncertain.
J.A. With regard to the aggregation of punitive damages, the court of appeals, after noting that the issue was one of first impression within the circuit, J.A. 61, held that the aggregate amount of punitive damages sought by the class is an insufficient basis for jurisdiction.
www.usdoj.gov /osg/briefs/2005/3mer/1ami/2004-1140.mer.ami.html   (6982 words)

  
 Martin v. Shaw's Supermarkets
Shaw's argues that both of Martin's statutory claims are inconsistent with the labor agreement; that resolution of this "inconsistency" charge requires interpretation of the agreement; and that the claims are therefore preempted under the Supreme Court's own rubric.
Martin responds that the "management rights" clause cannot be inconsistent with her state-law claims in this case because she is no longer covered by the agreement.
Martin next says that Shaw's employee handbook guarantees to her the very right to priority in rehiring established by section 75A.
www.law.emory.edu /1circuit/jan97/96-1863.01a.html   (2341 words)

  
 Martin v WCB
Martin's complaint of pain, that he was developing early signs of chronic pain and that under the FRP Regulations, chronic pain is generally excluded from the operation of the Act.
Martin appealed the Board's decision to the Appeals Tribunal on the ground that the FRP Regulations and s.
Martin was deprived of temporary earnings loss and medical treatment benefits to which he would be entitled were he suffering from a condition other than chronic pain.
aiws.sphosting.com /martin.htm   (15033 words)

  
 macdonald estate v. martin   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-27)
Twaddle and the appellant Martin, assisted in the preparation of many documents, prepared and attended examinations for discovery, was present when a settlement was discussed by the parties and during discussions of a settlement with representatives of the law firm of Thompson, Dorfman, Sweatman, and participated in the taking of de bene esse evidence.
The lawyer must not advise or represent both sides of a dispute and, save after adequate disclosure to and with the consent of the client or prospective client concerned, he should not act or continue to act in a matter when there is or there is likely to be a conflicting interest.
The statement in Chapter V should therefore be accepted as the expression by the profession in Canada that it wishes to impose a very high standard on a lawyer who finds himself or herself in a position where confidential information may be used against a former client.
www.lexum.umontreal.ca /csc-scc/en/pub/1990/vol3/html/1990scr3_1235.html   (10892 words)

  
 OSCN Found Document:Martin v. Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co.
Martin appealed and the Court of Appeals Division 4 reversed, holding that a question of fact existed as to whether the three-year old was an uninsured motorist whose negligence caused Ms.
Martin was "legally entitled to recover" damages from three-year old Katie Martin, Hartford correctly rejected her claim.
Here, there was no tortfeasor because three-year old Katie Martin was, as a matter of law, innocent of any wrongdoing, as she was too young to understand the risk that moving the shift lever might cause the car to roll and injure Betty Martin.
www.oscn.net /applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?citeID=4479   (1231 words)

  
 Martin v. Bissonnette
Petitioner-appellant Craig Martin, a state prisoner, sought habeas relief based on a claim that the state court's exclusion of his mother from the courtroom during part of the testimony of a key prosecution witness deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to a public trial.
She also stated that she had been frightened by James Martin (the petitioner's brother, who, she said, had pointed at her from the back of the courtroom), by the petitioner's girlfriend, and by an unidentified woman (who, she said, had given her dirty looks, "scaring [her] from testifying").
Those requirements – including the existence of an overriding interest that is likely to be prejudiced in the absence of closure and that the closure must be no more expansive than necessary to protect that interest – adequately safeguard a defendant's interest in permitting his family to be present in the courtroom.
www.law.emory.edu /1circuit/may97/96-1856.01a.html   (2059 words)

  
 98-3102 -- Martin v. State of Kansas -- 08/19/1999
Martin has failed to present evidence to rebut the State's written policy that the disclosure request is intended to gather information to be used in setting post assignments and establishing reasonable accommodations, which are job-related purposes that are consistent with business necessity.
Martin claims that the State had a blanket policy of requiring employees to be "100% healed" before returning to work, which violates the ADA because the alleged policy does not allow for a required case-by-case assessment of an individual's ability to perform the essential functions of his or her job.
However, even assuming that Martin understood that his response was wholly voluntary, we fail to discern anything in the statutory or regulatory framework that indicates that the legality of a medical inquiry (as opposed to a medical examination) hinges on the voluntariness of an employee's response to that inquiry.
www.kscourts.org /ca10/cases/1999/08/98-3102.htm   (4906 words)

  
 PGA TOUR, INC. V. MARTIN   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-27)
Respondent Martin is a talented golfer afflicted with a degenerative circulatory disorder that prevents him from walking golf courses.
When Martin turned pro and entered the Q-School, he made a request, supported by detailed medical records, for permission to use a golf cart during the third stage.
Allowing Martin to use a golf cart, despite petitioner’s walking requirement, is not a modification that would “fundamentally alter the nature” of petitioner’s tours or the third stage of the Q-School.
straylight.law.cornell.edu /supct/html/00-24.ZS.html   (815 words)

  
 MARTIN V
There is a very wide divergence between the relationship of bailer and bailee and the relationship of licenser and licensee, in that the latter, in the absence of some special contractual provision, carries no obligation on the part of the licenser towards the licensee in relation to the chattel subject to the license.
For this reason I am of the respectful opinion that the learned trial Judge was in error in his con­clusion of law that "the plaintiff did not actually part with possession of the Car and same was not parked or delivered for safe custody".
However, once it is proved that the property bailed was lost, damaged or destroyed while in custody of the bailee, the burden of proof shifts and the onus is on the bailee to negative negligence.
www.umanitoba.ca /Law/Courses/Fainstein/property/martin_v_town.htm   (7128 words)

  
 Martin v. Sullivan
DANA, J. [¶1] Marjorie Martin appeals from a partial summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Bradford, J.) on Counts II and III of her legal malpractice action against Jeffrey Sullivan.
[¶5] Martin argues she did not waive her right to a jury trial merely because she failed to pay the required fee, or alternatively, the court abused its discretion in not granting her a waiver of the fee or additional time to pay it.
Martin failed to pay the jury fee even though she was informed of the requirement by her attorney.
www.courts.state.me.us /opinions/documents/97me49ma.htm   (789 words)

  
 Martin v Edwards_Labs
In Martin, an artificial aortic valve was implanted in the plaintiff's decedent, Michael Martin, on June 7, 1976.
Michael Martin died on May 15, 1979 and the action was commenced on June 1, 1981.
Thus, in Martin, the injury-causing malfunction is the disintegration of the artificial heart valve and the entry of its Teflon particles into the bloodstream; in Lindsey, the unintended introduction of infectious bacteria into the uterus.
www.courts.state.ny.us /history/cases/martin_edwards.htm   (3198 words)

  
 FindLaw for Legal Professionals - Case Law, Federal and State Resources, Forms, and Code
In considering legislation which thus limits the dissemination of knowledge, we must 'be astute to examine the effect of the challenged legislation' and must 'weigh the circumstances and...
Religious differences are often sharp and pleaders at times resort 'to exaggeration, to vilification of men who have been, or are, prominent in church or state, and even to false statement.
Martin, 139 Ohio St. 372, 40 N.E.2d 154.
caselaw.lp.findlaw.com /scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=319&invol=141   (4738 words)

  
 PGA Tour v. Martin (2001) [00-24]   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-27)
Casey Martin is afflicted with a degenerative circulatory disorder that prevents him from walking golf courses.
Martin then filed suit under Title III of the ADA, which requires an entity operating "public accommodations" to make "reasonable modifications" in its policies "when...
The court found that the purpose of the PGA's walking rule was to insert fatigue into the skill of shot-making, and that Martin suffered significant fatigue due to his disability, even with the use of a cart.
www.oyez.org /oyez/resource/case/1156   (280 words)

  
 Martin v. Weckerly, 364 N.W.2d 93 (N.D. 1985)
The defendants, Norman D. Weckerly and Mattie Lou Weckerly (Weckerly), appealed a district court judgment awarding plaintiffs Hulda Martin, Mary Ann Hanson, and Harry C. Hanson (Hanson) compensatory and injunctive relief for damage to their property caused by drainage of surface water onto their land by Weckerly.
Hulda Martin and her daughter, Mary Ann Hanson, own property in Sheridan County which is farmed by Mary Ann's husband, Harry Hanson.
It was, or should have been, reasonably foreseeable to Weckerly that the commingling and subsequent drainage of his surface water with that of upstream landowners could cause harm to Hanson's property.
www.court.state.nd.us /court/opinions/10696.htm   (2421 words)

  
 Martin V. McHam
Martin V. McHam was born in South Carolina in 2 Nov 1837, the son of Jarett and Sela McHam who came to Lamar County, Texas about 1846 along with Jarrett's brother Wyatt McHam.
Martin appears in the 1860 Lamar County Census Precinct 6, Family 203-199, born in SC, 0/300, Farmer.
Martin V. McHam died 18 Feb 1905 and was buried in Block B-16SW-02, Evergreen Cemetery in Paris, Lamar County, Texas.
gen.1starnet.com /civilwar/mchamm.htm   (623 words)

  
 Martin V, 1368-1431, pope. The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition. 2001-05
His chief concern was the consolidation of the restored Church unity and the papal prestige, and to this end he made concordats with various rulers.
In Martin’s reign an attempt to prolong the schism was made in Spain by the followers of Antipope Benedict XIII (see Luna, Pedro de), who chose (1425) a successor to him called Clement VIII (otherwise Gil Sánchez Múñoz).
Alfonso V of Aragón patronized this antipope out of political motives, but, gaining nothing, he made Clement resign (1429) and recognized Martin.
www.bartleby.com /65/ma/Martin5.html   (300 words)

  
 Martin v
Casey Martin suffers from Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber Syndrome, a congenital, degenerative circulatory disorder that is manifested in a malformation of his right leg.
The court subsequently granted Martin partial summary judgment, holding that PGA is subject to Title III of the ADA because it owns, operates and leases golf courses, which the ADA identifies as places of public accommodation.
Our ruling that Martin is entitled to relief under § 12182(a) of Title III makes it unnecessary to address his alternative arguments.
www.faculty.piercelaw.edu /redfield/library/case-martin.pga.htm   (4247 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

Factbites
  About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   Press   |   Contact us  
Copyright © 2005-2007 www.factbites.com Usage implies agreement with terms.