| |
| | [No title] |
 | | Martin, Bedard sought to recover (1) the difference between the $12,000 he had received from the insurer and the $40,000 he had to pay for the property, (2) interest on the $12,000 purchase price, under various theories, and (3) attorney fees. |
 | | Martin to the extent of the insurance company’s payment, and having been compensated in an amount equal to the purchase price, Bedard may not maintain a separate action to recover (1) interest, (2) the additional money paid to the true owner of the property, or (3) mesne profits. |
 | | Martin argues that she is entitled to her attorney fees incurred both in the trial court and on appeal. |
| www.courts.state.co.us /coa/opinion/2004q3/03CA0813.doc (3538 words) |
|