| |
| | Peter Sedgwick: Theory at the Hour of Wilson (1965) (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-19) |
 | | The present review is intended only as a preliminary notice; much more will need to be said in our pages on particular arguments that have been put forward, and some essays can be expected to recur as major references in our own future thinking. |
 | | His thesis, roughly, is that the middle peasant (viz., the independent smallholder) plays a crucial initiating role in revolutionary movements in the countryside, and that the poor peasant of Leninist and Maoist hagiography is, to begin with, the least militant element until the power of the landlord is actually broken. |
 | | The ‘hegemonic party’ has to lead ‘the historic bloc’ in an ‘ascending integration’ of demands, ‘entering and inhabiting civil society at every point’, rearing a ‘rich and complex cultural synthesis’, a ‘philosophical anthropology’. |
| www.marxists.org.uk /archive/sedgwick/1965/xx/wilson.htm (2666 words) |
|