| |
| | gillespie |
 | | Certainly, an appeal to materialistic motives was made in the Commission documents that called for a rebalancing of the EUs external relations: the neighbouring Mediterranean states represented a market of 304 million consumers (compared with 116 million in the east); they also had a higher combined GDP and greater energy dependence on the south. |
 | | Northern European states endorsed the Euro-Mediterranean initiative with some doubts regarding its viability and, although somewhat unsure where it would lead, were convinced at least that the EU needed to take concerted action in relation to a peripheral area containing threats to the stability of Europe. |
 | | The northern states are, however, prepared to consider new initiatives in the strictly security domain, but there is a strong belief here that enough exist already, and that, inded, there are too many security structures for European states to use (Fenech, 1997): new ones, it is though would simply increase an existing tendency to duplication. |
| www.euforic.org /cidob/gilles.htm (3779 words) |
|