| |
| | TomDispatch - Tomgram: Danner vs. Kinsley on the Memo and the War |
 | | Michael Kinsley, editorial and opinion editor for the Los Angeles Times, then wrote a piece typical of this mainstream moment in the Washington Post, (No Smoking Gun), discounting the importance of the Downing Street Memos as, among other things, no more than "an encouraging sign of the revival of the left. |
 | | Of course, according to the rules under which Kinsley, and much of the rest of the American press, profess to be playing, one cannot say this; after all, this is the case that the Downing Street memo, all by itself, must be shown to prove. |
 | | Kinsley says nothing, either in his original article or in his letter, because he is concerned only with a single question: Does the memo offer "documentary proof that President Bush had firmly decided to go to war against Iraq by July 2002"? |
| www.tomdispatch.com /index.mhtml?pid=7114 (3749 words) |
|