
	Where results make sense

Topic: Might is Right

Related Topics

Ragnar Redbeard

Boyd Rice

Taurus

In the News (Sat 28 Nov 09)

Northern Trust

Marvin Harrison

Peter Chernin

Gary Locke

Match Play

Penelope Cruz

Mickey Rourke

AR Rahman

Danny Boyle

Hugh Jackman

	Right To Play:
		Right To Play, sportswear brand adidas and international football star Zinedine Zidane have a common belief that sport has the power to change the world.
		Right To Play harnesses the universal love of play to engage children and youth in regular, organized play activities that address critical challenges like the lack of basic education, lack of health information and the impact of conflict on both the individual and community networks and support systems.
		Right To Play Coaches in the Chawama compound - Lusaka's largest and most densely populated township - wondered what they could do to help prevent children, who make up the majority of Chawama’s population, from catching the disease, which is spread through inadequate sanitation and the proximity of waste to the community’s water supply.
	www.righttoplay.com (427 words)

	Might Is Right - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
		Might Is Right, or The Survival of the Fittest is a book by Ragnar Redbeard.
		Might is Right is amazingly blunt in its agenda, though as Anton LaVey describes in his introduction, it contains "glaring contradictions." The book contains a harsh view of the world.
		Ideas of moral right and wrong are dispensed with, save only that right which is founded upon the strength to make it so.
	en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Might_is_Right (232 words)

	Beyond Might Makes Right (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-05)
		Instead of thinking that rights are granted to an entire group, a more accurate view of rights is that they are granted to individuals, because it is individuals, not groups, who are capable of suffering and dying.
		While many people grant rights to some beings and not to others based only on the majority interpretation of their individual religious doctrine, secularists who accept that all humans have rights yet reject the idea that any non- human animals have rights must also be basing their moral code on faith.
		Some attempt to discredit the entire animal rights movement as being comprised of "terrorists." This unfounded distortion is an attempt to ignore the moral issues surrounding the use and abuse of animals by focusing on a few acts of property destruction perpetrated by a small number of individuals.
	articles.animalconcerns.org /ar-voices/archive/beyond_might.html (6149 words)

	[No title] (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-05)
		But "Might" is put together well, and many other publications could learn from its inspiring use of fl and white, bi-color layout, which makes up the majority of the magazine.
		The writers are witty, sarcastic, and sharp (I wouldn't recommend being on the receiving end of a "Might" satire or criticism).
		Based on my experience, "Might" is the best manifestation of our generation and twenty-something culture that periodicals have to offer.
	www.pub.umich.edu /daily/1995/11-30-95/arts/clmn.might.mag.html (766 words)

	Dark Doctrines, Left Hand Path and Satanism
		Many have said before, and repeatedly, that "might is right!" is the war cry of the vanquished, that is, it's the cry of those that fell victims of might.
		The Christians still have might, but their free-handed use of it has been tempered by those who were TRULY against them: and none of those adversaries who really pushed them back and won gains for the human condition ever thought or said that might was right.
		Might Is Right doesn't seem like a manifesto of a political radical intent on the "emancipation of the workers." Oh no? OH YES IT IS! You can't use an analysis based on PRESENT DAY behavior of "liberals" and not at all on the REAL revolutionaries who behaved very differently.
	www.apodion.com /vad/article.php?id=15&aid=271 (6337 words)

	Satanic Reds
		Many have said before, and repeatedly, that "might is right!" is the war cry of the vanquished, that is, it's the cry of those that fell victims of might.
		The Christians still have might, but their free-handed use of it has been tempered by those who were TRULY against them: and none of those adversaries who really pushed them back and won gains for the human condition ever thought or said that might was right.
		Might Is Right doesn't seem like a manifesto of a political radical intent on the "emancipation of the workers." Oh no? OH YES IT You can't use an analysis based on PRESENT DAY behavior of "liberals" and not at all on the REAL revolutionaries who behaved very differently.
	www.geocities.com /satanicreds/might-right.html (6343 words)

	Beyond Might Makes Right -- Vegan Outreach
		These fundamental rights are usually (at a minimum): the entitlement of individuals to have basic control of their lives and bodies, without infringing on the rights of others.
		In other words: the right not to be killed, caged, or experimented on against their will at the hands of moral agents (persons able to understand and act from a moral code).
		People who believe that rights are granted to infants because of their value to adult humans would have to admit that infants who are not valued by other humans could be used in medical research.
	www.veganoutreach.org /advocacy/beyond.html (2672 words)

	Might and Right (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-05)
		Right never does wrong, even when possessed of infinite power.
		It is never to be trusted unless under the direction of Right.
		Therefore remember that no emperor, king, prince, president, governor, judge, general, legislative, court, army, or multitude, can make that right which is essentially wrong, either by declaring it to be right, or threatening death against those who refuse to perpetrate it.
	www.adinballou.org /mightandright.shtml (94 words)

	Might Makes Right:
		Rights guide each individual member of the group to seek to satisfy his wants by harvesting from outside the group rather than from another member within the group.
		Rights are found among: reapers harvesting a crop; hunters dividing their grounds; vikings raiding a village; legislators gathering pork.
		But notice that a right, granted out of kindness, by some members of the community to others who lack force to enforce it themselves, presents a direct cost (as opposed to a direct benefit) to those who advocate the right.
	libertariannation.org /a/f31h4.html (3020 words)

	Socialist Standard January 2007 page 11
		In other words, the state’s recognition of the “right” to strike was the state accepting that the workers had already acquired the “might” to strike.
		So, we can say that the “right to free speech” or “the right to a fair trial”, etc exist in some country when this is provided for in the legislation of that country.
		Talk of the government emanating from the “nation” and governing with the consent of the governed might lead to the conclusion that the right to vote, i.e.
	www.worldsocialism.org /spgb/jan07/text/page11.html (822 words)

	Arthur Desmond - Ragnar Redbeard and "Might Is Right"
		Ragnar Redbeard was the pseudonym of Arthur Desmond, the author of 'Might Is Right', an ultra-individualistic screed of the 1890s.
		A bizarre mixture of Stirner's anarcho-individualism, Nietzsche's "Triumph of the Will" and Darwin's evolutionary ideologies, "Might Is Right" was seized upon by leftists of the time and published in numerous countries.
		All Unite in Demonstrating that Might is Right.
	www.takver.com /history/desmonda.htm (1258 words)

	England and the War - Might Is Right (by Walter Raleigh)
		Might is Right; but the sort of might which enables one nation to govern another in time of peace is very unlike the armoured thrust of the war-engine.
		Might is Right; and it is quite conceivable that they may acquire colonies by violence.
		Might is Right; but when a young Englishman is set down at an outpost of Empire to govern a warlike tribe, he has to do a good deal of hard thinking on the problem of political power and its foundations.
	www.authorama.com /england-and-the-war-3.html (3788 words)

	Sovereign Living™ -- Might vs. Right (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-05)
		A later version is "Might is Right - The Survival of the Fittest".
		Smith was a proponent of the natural rights concept as espoused by the U.S. Founding Fathers, Ayn Rand ("Atlas Shrugged"), and many others.
		Granted, rights are a handy tool to wield against someone else or some group that also believes in them.
	home.earthlink.net /~beand/sovliv/mightvsright.htm (626 words)

	WorldNetDaily: Might and right
		Among the many causes of that victory was the indisputable fact that the right of private property was an essential prerequisite for prosperity.
		In America, and wherever they were left alone by their governments to provide for themselves, decent free people created a bounty of mutually beneficial enterprise that left the planners and bureaucrats of socialist countries gasping in awe.
		We may pray that the war will also be the occasion of a firmer recollection of that right by all Americans, and of a firmer resolve to preserve it in our national life.
	www.wnd.com /news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=24917 (997 words)

	MIGHT IS RIGHT by Ragnar Redbeard, Anton LaVey (Book) in Reference (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-05)
		Might Is Right was made famous after Dr. LaVey cited it as an influence, and included portions of the historic document within the pages of The Satanic Bible.
		Might Is Right, or The Survival of the Fittest is a book by Ragnar Redbeard.
		The Chicago Tribune said "it is surely one of the most incendiary works ever to be published anywhere." It is written in such a manner that it could be construed by some to be a work advocating Social Darwinism and be construed by others to be a satire on Social Darwinism.
	www.lulu.com /content/282870 (421 words)

	When might is right - National - smh.com.au
		The right wing of the party, which can best be characterised as having a more conservative social agenda than the left or the moderates, gained control of the state executive in July.
		It points to the views of the right's patriarch, MLC David Clarke, as an indication of where the party is heading.
		But the right is now talking about replacing the key seats committee, which could put it on a collision course with the state director, Graham Jaeschke, who arrived eight months ago from Adelaide to head the NSW division.
	www.smh.com.au /news/national/when-might-is-right/2005/12/02/1133422108652.html (1378 words)

	(Talk.Origins) Survival of the fittest implies might makes right - CreationWiki (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-05)
		Survival of the fittest implies that "might makes right" is a proper guide to behavior.
		This argument does not dispute the claim that "might makes right", but is instead an example of one "right" that is made through "might".
		Evolution is a history filled with "might makes right", and if true, then we are born out of it.
	www.nwcreation.net /wiki/index.php?title=CA002 (348 words)

	Satanisk Forum - The War Cry of the Vanquished (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-05)
		"Might Is Right" er den engelske titel på første fjerdedel af "The Satanic Bible", og er den del af bogen, der appellerer stærkt til en vis type læsere.
		Several of us who have viewed members of the Church of Satan have said before, and repeatedly, that “might is right!” is the war cry of the vanquished, that is, it is the cry of those that fell victims of might.
		The few are the ones who never were suppressed; the ones who were never taught that a lie silenced by might makes a truth; and the ones whose hearts are not closed to a clenched fist that holds themselves enthralled.
	www.sataniskforum.dk /content/view/220/49 (1467 words)

	Might Makes Right
		We depend on might to be mighty in the service of rendering justice and preserving moral order.
		I'm proud and grateful that our nation has chosen to exercise might in defense of a people who have chafed under the brutal jackboot of a totalitarian socialist dictator for decades.
		Might, when in the hands of a moral people, ends wars and engenders freedom and prosperity.
	www.freerepublic.com /focus/news/868935/posts (586 words)

	Justice Might is Right Thrasymachus Equations - FrostCloud Forums
		He is imposing the quality of might as ability to do harm if you disagree as 'right'.
		Might is a property that is a measure of 'right' imposed upon it by Thrasymachus in the same way I could say a red book is orange.
		Others might say that it should not happen because it is fundamentally immoral, and that we should consider what is moral if possible.
	www.frostcloud.com /forum/showthread.php?t=5446 (4237 words)

	Might Makes Right (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-05)
		In America, one of the primary methods of choice in expanding government power and robbing people of their rights is to re-define the God-given the rights of the citizens.
		Bill Clinton said it quite poignantly, “…we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of individual freedom to Americans, it was assumed that the Americans who had that freedom would use it responsibly.” First of all, Clinton was mistaken that the Constitution “gave” anybody any freedom.
		It is the position of Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Ministry of Human Resources and the Honorable Murray Coell (referred to as the “Crown” or the “province”) that the Petitioners cannot obtain the relief because both the Crown Proceeding Act, R.S.B. 1996, c.
	www.fathers.ca /might_makes_right.htm (3324 words)

	Might equals right - Opinions
		According to University guidelines, no employer will be given access to the campus to recruit if they have discriminatory employment practices, such as the military's policy of not allowing any openly gay person to enlist.
		With enrollment declining, the military is feeding off that stockpile of able-bodied, impressionable and unemployed potential recruits that are U.S. universities.
		Rumor has it we might even be seeing a return of the draft.
	www.dailytargum.com /media/paper168/news/2004/04/27/Opinions/Might.Equals.Right-672065.shtml (809 words)

	Jonah Goldberg's Goldberg File on National Review Online
		He might have become a king if he'd wanted, but he chose not to.
		One used force for right and the other used force for wrong.
		We aren't always right, but only an ignoramus would think that the "powerless" (and therefore allegedly virtuous) nations of the world would do better with such might (imagine, say, Robert Mugabe with trillions of dollars and a first-class army).
	www.nationalreview.com /goldberg/goldberg102302.asp (2006 words)

	washingtonpost.com: Lessons of Might and Right
		Connie Rice, the civil rights lawyer, says white people's attraction to her cousin is more complex than they realize.
		The two women had never met, but Albright says she knew of Rice's bond with Albright's refugee father, who was an impassioned believer in government's responsibility to right society's wrongs, and assumed from that – and Rice's roots in segregated Birmingham – that she was a Democrat.
		As the car pulled away, her head was deep in her books, but the fingers of her right hand still were waving, as if playing piano in the air.
	www.washingtonpost.com /ac2/wp-dyn/A57477-2001Sep7?language=printer (4229 words)

	Andy Nowicki -- DOES WHITE PLUS MIGHT MAKE RIGHT?
		Yet he also made it abundantly clear that in his world-view only the victor in a struggle had a right to dictate conditions, thus rendering his own objections to Germany's humiliation at the hands of her enemies effectively irrelevant.
		Today's would-be Hitlers in the white-nationalist movement frequently commit a similar logical fallacy in their rhetoric; they promote a "might makes right" philosophy even as they profess outrage over an event such as the Wichita Massacre, in which "might" (if not "white") certainly prevailed.
		Then again, a one-way sense of outrage (whereby one deplores one's enemy's evil acts while one excuses one's own) is, shall we say, highly convenient, especially for cynical politicians who stand to gain the most through such calculated disingenuousness.
	www.thornwalker.com /ditch/nowicki_ar2004.htm (889 words)

	Plum Blossoms: Right Is Might, or Right Needs Might? (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-05)
		I suspect that he's probably a and#8220;big pictureand#8221; type of person, which is why I agree with the general jist of the column, that conservative ideas have...
		I suspect that he's probably a “big picture” type of person, which is why I agree with the general jist of the column, that conservative ideas have become entrenched into the consensus of the Anglosphere (although not the European Continent).
		Frum starts off with the decline of the Right in the 1990s, as Tony Blair is among the leaders of the Third Way going into power (one year later than John Howard's first win in Australia, it should be pointed out).
	www.plum-blossom.net /blog/archives/2005/09/right_is_might.php (556 words)

	Canada and the World Backgrounder: Might is right (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-05)
		Nations were prepared to give up a little of their national sovereignty - their previously unrestricted right to wage war - in exchange for not becoming a victim of someone else's aggression.
		The 1933 Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States sets out the main elements of state sovereignty, they include: a permanent population, a defined territory, and a functioning government.
		Article 2 of the UN Charter calls on member states to "settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered." In addition, all members "shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force..."
	www.findarticles.com /p/articles/mi_qa3695/is_200301/ai_n9204010 (1452 words)

	Bush at Sea - Does this war president have any idea what he's talking about? By Fred Kaplan
		Either the statement means something—that we now reserve the right to wage pre-emptive war on a hostile power that has the mere capacity to make weapons of mass destruction—or it's empty blather.
		Or at least Rumsfeld was right in the battlefield phase of the war.
		Now, however, the president is asserting a right to strike first not merely if a hostile power has deadly weapons or even if it is building such weapons, but also if it might build such weapons sometime in the future.
	www.slate.com /id/2095184 (1799 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)