| |
| | [No title] |
 | | This case began on May 6, 1996, when the Town of Millry, Alabama, sued the petitioners asserting claims of fraud, breach of warranty, negligence, and wantonness stemming from the petitioners' design and construction of Millry's expansion of its existing sewer system ("the expansion system"). |
| | Also, because those inspections were completed at least two years before any of the Millry residents intervened, further inspections would still be needed to determine what damage the residents were claiming at the time they became plaintiffs. |
| | Interestingly, in late 1999, the petitioners had apparently sought to take the depositions of the Millry residents who were connected to the expansion system (before the residents intervened in this action), but were asked by counsel for the intervenors to postpone the depositions, because the residents would be intervening in the action. |
| www.wallacejordan.com /decisions/Opinions2002/1010815.htm (4231 words) |
|
