| |
| | Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) |
 | | The officers admitted at trial that Miranda was not advised that he had a right to have an attorney present.{66} Two hours later, the [384 U.S. 492] officers emerged from the interrogation room with a written confession signed by Miranda. |
 | | In the absence of warnings, the burden would be on the State to prove that counsel was knowingly and intelligently waived or that, in the totality of the circumstances, including the failure to give the necessary warnings, the confession was clearly voluntary. |
 | | United States, 160 U.S. While a later case said the Fifth Amendment privilege controlled admissibility, this proposition was not itself developed in subsequent decisions.{2} The Court did, however, heighten the test of admissibility in federal trials to one of voluntariness "in fact," Wan v. |
| www.lectlaw.com /files/case04.htm (19216 words) |
|