
	Where results make sense

Topic: Moon landing hoax

Related Topics

Apollo moon landing conspiracy theory

Soviet Moonshot

Clementine mission

Apollo 1

Virgil Grissom

Gus Grissom

Lunar Laser Ranging Experiment

Photography

Selene

European Southern Observatory

	Apollo Moon Landing hoax accusations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
		Hoax critics have claimed that a key assumption of hoax proponents is that the burden of proof for the Apollo landings lies entirely with NASA.
		Hoax hypothesis: NASA's portrayal of the Moon landing is an orchestrated hoax.
		The evidence regarding the Moon landings is met by hoax believers with skepticism, who label the NASA story as unconvincing propaganda made by the establishment to cover up the alleged lie.
	en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Moon_landing_hoax (11097 words)

	The Moon Hoax Debate
		The hoax advocates usually reference this photograph [see photo] because the lights bare a vague resemblance to studio spotlights, however there are many photographs, such as this one [see photo], where the same lights seem to contradict this hoax claim.
		The hoax advocates' claim that an exhaust plume should be visible is due to their experience seeing launches of such rockets as the Saturn V and the Space Shuttle, where large columns of smoke and flame are seen trailing the vehicle.
		The failure of the Soviet Union to land a man on the moon was due to the failure of their N1 moon rocket, which was the USSR equivalent of the USA Saturn V. The Soviets attempted two test launches of the N1 in 1969, the first on 21-February and the second on 3-July.
	www.braeunig.us /space/hoax.htm (15291 words)

	New Science: The Moon Landing Hoax (03/30/01)
		The first Moon landing by Apollo 11 was less than one year later, on July 20, 1969.
		The final Moon landing mission, Apollo 17, touched down on the Moon on December 11, 1972.
		Apollo 13 was unable to land on the lunar surface due to trouble on the spaceship, but collected Moon photos during a swing around the Moon.
	liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov /News/2001/News-MoonLanding.asp (1250 words)

	Was The Apollo Moon Landing Fake?
		The Soviets, with their own competing moon program and an intense economic and political and military rivalry with the USA, could be expected to have cried foul if the USA tried to fake a Moon landing.
		Proponents of the Apollo hoax suggest that the Soviet Union, and latterly Russia, and the United States were allied in the exploration of space, during the Cold war and after.
		In early November 2002 NASA announced that it was cancelling publication of a manuscript by Jim Oberg that was intended to refute the claims that the Moon landings were a hoax.
	www.apfn.org /apfn/moon.htm (9391 words)

	The Real Moon Landing Hoax
		The 'revealed' version of the Soviet moon program was that their equipment was never safe enough to launch cosmonauts around the moon before Apollo 8 or land them on the moon before Apollo 11.
		Russia intended to launch the second N1 lunar landing super-booster with a mystery payload; and a Luna Ye-8-5 robot lander, that was to recover lunar soil and return it to earth before Apollo 11.
		Attempts to land a Lunokhod robot rover in January and a Luna soil return spacecraft in June were both thwarted by Proton booster failures.
	www.astronautix.com /articles/theghoax.htm (3013 words)

	The Apollo Hoax
		The surface of the Moon is baldly exposed to cosmic rays and solar flares, and some of that radiation is very hard to stop with shielding.
		It would be better to try and fool the public and hoax the footage, rather than let their biggest rival in the World strike a huge moral victory by beating them to the Moon.
		In the documentary 'Paper Moon' The host measures a replica of the LEM at The Space Centre in Houston, what he finds is that the 'official' measurements released by NASA are bogus and that the astronauts could not have got out of the LEM.
	www.ufos-aliens.co.uk /cosmicapollo.html (10999 words)

	Redzero's Moonhoax - How Apollo moon landings really happened (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-01)
		In order to successfully land on the moon, NASA needed to either buy in the absolute latest in technology, or develop it themselves.
		So it should come as no surprise that some of the equipment used was totally unheard of in the 1960s and, because it was designed to work in an alien environment, is still a novelty 30 years later.
		This lack of understanding is the source of many of the hoax theories.
	www.redzero.demon.co.uk /moonhoax (340 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)