
	Where results make sense

Topic: Mora Court District

Related Topics

Dalecarlia

Mora Municipality

Dalarna County

Mora, Minnesota

1560

Santa Claus

North Pole

In the News (Tue 29 Dec 09)

Northern Trust

Marvin Harrison

Peter Chernin

Gary Locke

Match Play

Penelope Cruz

Mickey Rourke

AR Rahman

Danny Boyle

Hugh Jackman

	Mora (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-09-17)
		Mora, Sweden - a municipality of Dalarna County in Sweden
		Mora Court District - a district of Dalecarlia in Sweden
		Mora (plant) is a genus of plants in the subfamily Caesalpinioideae of the pea family Fabaceae
	www.ufaqs.com /wiki/en/mo/Mora.htm (153 words)

	[No title]
		With respect to the challenge to the integrity of the tapes, the district court credited the testimony of the government's expert and found that the government had proved by clear and convincing evidence that the tapes being admitted into evidence were in their original form and had not been tampered with.
		The court found this delay to be "excessive as a matter of law" and held that it required the automatic suppression of all the Levittown tapes, regardless of whether the government could prove that those tapes had not been altered (and thus that the delay in sealing did not affect the integrity of the tapes).
		In addition, the court identified a number of other factors to be considered in evaluating the adequacy of the government's explanation for a sealing delay: prejudice to the defendant, benefit to the government, the length of the delay, and the cause of the delay.
	www.usdoj.gov /osg/briefs/1989/sg890548.txt (5721 words)

	ILW.COM - (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-09-17)
		The majority of courts to consider the issue have rejected the proposition that conditions of incarceration faced by deportable aliens may be considered as a possible ground for departure in a non-immigration case.
		Mora alleges his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to seek a U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0 downward departure based on Mora's willingness to consent to deportation at the conclusion of his sentence.
		Mora argues the U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1(d) increase in his criminal history score was improper and his counsel was ineffective for not objecting, but Mora was on probation and subject to an arrest warrant for failing to appear in Massachusetts at the time this offense was committed, so the two-point criminal history sentence enhancement was appropriate.
	www.ilw.com /immigdaily/cases/2002,0403-Mora.shtm (1415 words)

	USCA1 Opinion 04-2306
		In the case of González and his wife, the district court found that the claims against certain defendants were barred by the statute of limitations and that the remaining defendants were entitled to qualified immunity.
		Because we agree with the district court that the claims of both sets of plaintiffs-appellants are precluded by the statute of limitations or qualified immunity, we affirm the decisions of the district court.
		The district court -- by "assuming arguendo" that a constitutional violation had occurred -- was able to dismiss the cases without deciding whether the cancellation of appellants' milk quotas did in fact constitute an unconstitutional taking of their property.
	www.ca1.uscourts.gov /cgi-bin/getopn.pl?OPINION=04-2306.01A (2585 words)

	USCA1 Opinion 02-2071
		We hold that a district court does not retain supplemental enforcement jurisdiction over a settlement after granting a Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) motion unless the parties either have agreed to incorporate the terms of the settlement into the dismissal order or have executed a stipulation authorizing the court to retain jurisdiction over the implementation of the settlement.
		On May 13, 1987, the Municipality initiated an action against the Department in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, claiming that the Department was in violation of the Medicaid Act and in breach of contract.
		The text went on to remind the parties that the district court had "inherent power to enforce settlement agreements" and expressed the view that, notwithstanding the voluntary dismissal, the district court retained jurisdiction over the case.
	www.ca1.uscourts.gov /cgi-bin/getopn.pl?OPINION=02-2071.01A (2412 words)

	Mora v. IC, No. 1-98-4775WC
		Second, the court observed that claimant's amendment did not fall within the rule allowing amendments to applications for adjustment of claim to be made during an arbitration hearing because claimant did not move to amend at the time he first learned that Mi Sun Park and her husband were owners of Seven Star Electronics.
		The court further determined that the amendment was a nullity because claimant did not obtain leave to amend his application from the arbitrator until closing arguments.
		The trial court found that claimant should have requested leave to amend on June 25, 1996, because a request at that time would have allowed the necessary evidence to be presented so that the arbitrator could have decided whether the additional parties could have been properly added.
	www.state.il.us /Court/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2000/1stDistrict/March/HTML/1984775.htm (2850 words)

	97-4093 -- U.S. v. Mora -- 02/09/1998
		Mora asserts that the district court erred in (1) denying her motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds; (2) improperly reviewing the magistrate's report and recommendation; and (3) denying her motion to suppress evidence.
		The district court held a hearing on these matters on February 24 and ordered the parties to file supplemental briefs with respect to Mora's objections to the report and recommendation and her motion to dismiss.
		Mora additionally complains that the district court failed to conduct an adequate review of the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and Mora further urges that the district court erred in denying her suppression motion.
	www.kscourts.org /ca10/cases/1998/02/97-4093.htm (3794 words)

	01-8020 -- U.S. v. Mora -- 06/18/2002
		Mora filed a motion with the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, requesting that the court vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence.
		Mora's failure to raise the Apprendi issue in the district court bars him from raising the issue on appeal, and whether Apprendi is a "watershed" decision that is made retroactive to initial habeas petitions.
		Mora submitted his initial motion in the district court, and was less than six months old at the time that the district court decided Mr.
	www.kscourts.org /ca10/cases/2002/06/01-8020.htm (2174 words)

	Memorandum to Clients - Covenant Enforcement: Act Now or Lose Later - August 1, 1997
		Mora and the Moores' request for a temporary injunction to enforce the covenants.
		Again, the Mora court did not specify the absolute deadline for bringing a claim; however, the manner in which the Moore claim was disposed reflects that an eight month delay may be fatal to a case.
		The appellate court stated that to be included within the definition of "statutory employer" under the workers' compensation laws and therefore immune from a civil lawsuit, a party must show that it was engaged in performing "contract work" and that it sublet a part of the contract work to another party.
	www.gelfandarpe.com /memorandums/UPDATE97.08.htm (969 words)

	United States of America, Appellee, v. Jason Brion Angiulo, Defendant, Appellant.
		The defendants do not challenge the court's finding that they were members of the alleged RICO conspiracy and it was not clearly erroneous for the district court to conclude that they were aware, generally, that the Patriarca Family engaged in violent [*970] crimes, even murders, to further its own interests.
		Since the district court found, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Kazonis was a member of the obstruction conspiracy and that violent means were employed by other members of that conspiracy to further its objectives, the statements of co-conspirators regarding plans to murder LaFreniere were admissible against him on Count 6.
		Finally, the district court correctly found that the monitoring agents' submission of [*980] regular five-day progress reports to the judge authorizing the surveillance ensured compliance with the minimization requirements of the statute.
	www.ipsn.org /court_cases/us_v_angiulo-appeal-1988-05-24.htm (11983 words)

	Mora Municipality - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
		Mora is a Municipality in Dalarna County, in central Sweden.
		The house where Swedish painter Anders Zorn was born in 1860 is in Mora and has been turned into a museum.
		Mora is also known as the end of the Vasaloppet, an enduring 90 kilometers long skiing event, with more than 15,000 annual participants.
	en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Mora_Municipality (165 words)

	State v. Mora, 2000 ND 179, 617 N.W.2d 478
		The district court stated, "It is alleged by the State that because of your prior record if you are convicted of this offense there is a minimum mandatory sentence of 20 years imprisonment which the court must impose." Mora responded that he understood the charge and the maximum and minimum penalty.
		Mora does not contest the voluntariness of his plea but argues the district court erred in imposing a mandatory minimum sentence of twenty years imprisonment.
		Mora did not preserve a right to appeal by entering a conditional guilty plea; rather, he contested the validity of the charging document at the time of sentencing.
	www.court.state.nd.us /court/opinions/990377.htm (3437 words)

	Mora at AllExperts
		Mora, Portugal - a municipality in the district** of Ãvora
		**Mora, Sweden - a municipality of Dalarna County
		* Mora, a genus of plants in the pea family Fabaceae.
	en.allexperts.com /e/m/mo/mora.htm (252 words)

	Collective Bargaining « Pensions & Benefits Weblog
		The district court views that evidence as “slight,” to be considered in the context of the entire contract.
		Mora pointed to DOL regulation 29 CFR 2530.200b-2(a)(2), which defined an hour of service as including “each hour for which an employee is paid, or entitled to payment, by the employer on account of a period of time during which no duties are performed.
		Mora’s difficulty, stated the court, was that payments to the vacation trust were not made on account of time when no duties were performed, but were merely a part of the payment for the period during which services were performed.
	fuguerre.wordpress.com /tag/collective-bargaining (2440 words)

	[No title]
		In response, Petrochem filed suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, charging that twenty-one named unions, by filing environmental objections, were delaying and "threaten- ing to delay" construction projects "unless and until the project developers and/or general contractors agreed to boy- cott open-shop contractors such as Petrochem." Compl.
		The district court dismissed, this time with prejudice, finding that the complaint failed to conform to the court's instructions and was legally inadequate for several other reasons.
		Pointing out that the California federal district court had found that Petrochem failed to identify a single meritless objection to any construction project, the Board concluded that all of the petitioning was protected by the First Amendment and thus not barred by section 8(b)(4)(ii)(B).
	pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov /common/opinions/200101/99-1530a.txt (4080 words)

	2003 NYSlipOp 13924
		Mora is the ground lessee and operator of The Gorham Hotel, located in mid-town Manhattan, and Chascona is the fee owner of the property.
		Mora appeared in the English proceedings for the limited purpose of contesting the High Court's jurisdiction over Stolzenberg, the anchor defendant, on the grounds that he was not domiciled in England at the time that Mora argued was critical (i.e., when the writ of summons for Stolzenberg was served rather than when it was issued).
		Subsequent to Supreme Court's decision and order, defendants in 2001 and 2002 applied to the High Court to set aside the default judgments entered against them because of their failure to comply with the "unless" orders, and to allow them to defend the tracing and conspiracy claims on the merits.
	www.courts.state.ny.us /reporter/slips/13924.htm (2476 words)

	Converted WP file /web/download/n/opinion/Holding/00sc-027
		The Court of Appeals rejected this argument and held that "[e]vidence which the state intends to use at trial must be disclosed," and that "[t]he state must also disclose items which are material to the preparation of the defense." Id. at 16, 727 P.2d at 955.
		The trial court also believed that the prosecutor intentionally kept the information from defense counsel, stating, "You held onto this because you knew it would be thunder, right?" "In a criminal case, the district attorney should not hesitate to show his [or her] entire file to the defendant.
		It is not the primary duty of the district attorney to convict a defendant.
	www.supremecourt.nm.org /pastopinion/VIEW/00sc-027.html (4892 words)

	People v Somerville (2004 NYSlipOp 24031)
		The defendant further claims that the court is prohibited from sentencing him to a term greater than a period of incarceration having a minimum of 9 years and a maximum of 18 years under the doctrines of judicial vindictiveness and double jeopardy.
		The defendant claims that the decision by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York that the Maryland crime does not qualify as a predicate felony under New York precedent is the law of the case.
		The court also holds that the proper application of state law is the province of the state courts and not the federal courts.
	www.courts.state.ny.us /reporter/3dseries/2004/2004_24031.htm (3948 words)

	WD61821: Rhodes Engineering Company, Inc., Appellant v. Public Water Supply District No. 1 of Holt County, Rick ...
		The court’s decree set an election date of April 1, 1997, for voters residing within the boundaries of the district to vote on the proposition as to whether the District should be incorporated.
		Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of the Interim Parties on Plaintiff’s claim that there was a breach of the Interim Agreement in that it was not paid in full under the contract for the sign-ups and remand for further proceedings on that claim.
		Counsel for the Water District indicated to the trial court at the hearing that the matter was being expedited because the funding for the District was on hold and would not be released until the lawsuit was settled.
	www.courts.mo.gov /courts/pubopinions.nsf/ccd96539c3fb13ce8625661f004bc7da/f6069e324ec7fe4b86256e27006a8c34?OpenDocument (6677 words)

	Harrison v. Hardin Co. Community Unit School Dist. No. 1, No. 5-99-0225
		The School District filed a motion for summary judgment claiming that it was entitled to immunity under section 2-201 of the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act (the Act) (745 ILCS 10/2-201 (West 1994)).
		Accordingly, the judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
		The court reasoned that the fire marshal was responsible for planning and conducting fire drills, and in doing so the marshal balanced competing interests, including the interests of efficiency and safety, which competed for the time and resources of the department.
	www.state.il.us /court/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2000/5thDistrict/May/HTML/5990225.htm (2571 words)

	wilson not guilty
		Tepoz-Leon met Mora when he was a Spanish teacher advising the Wilson High School Latin American club and she was a student in the club, according to his testimony (she was never in one of his classes).
		The district said in its response that it is the state that does the background checks and the previous incident had not been brought to their attention.
		While noting the tragedy of the situation, the three-judge appellate court panel said that Mora was a legal adult at the time of her murder and that it would be wrong to blame the school or the district for her choices.
	www.gazettes.com /wilson11172005.html (338 words)

	Congressman Maurice Hinchey :: Representing the 22nd District of New York :: Media Ownership Reform Act (MORA)
		MORA would amend the 1934 Communications Act to restore the Fairness Doctrine and explicitly require broadcast licensees to provide a reasonable opportunity for the discussion of conflicting views on issues of public importance.
		MORA would invalidate the considerably weakened media ownership rules that were adopted by the Federal Communications Commission in 2003; rules that are now under new scrutiny through the FCC's Future Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
		MORA creates a new review process, to be carried by the FCC every three years, on how the commission's regulations on media ownership promote and protect localism, competition, diversity of voices, diversity of ownership, children's programming, small and local broadcasters, and technological advancement.
	www.house.gov /hinchey/issues/mora.shtml (575 words)

	Mora Magistrate Court
		The function of the Magistrate Court is to handle traffic citations and misdemeanor offenses, as well as civil claims for money up to $10,000 dollars, cases that would be handled by Small Claims court in many other states.
		Felony offenses receive a preliminary hearing in Magistrate Court, at which time the evidence is reviewed to determine whether to reduce the charges to misdemeanor ones, or to leave them as felonies and bind them over to District Court.
		Court costs on a traffic citation are $55.00, with any fines on top, and on a misdemeanor are $67.00, again with fines on top.
	www.arco-iris.com /mora/court.htm (435 words)

	Attorney Template (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-09-17)
		Mora has extensive experience in connection with the preparation and prosecution of patent applications on a wide variety of inventions, primarily dealing with electrical, electro-optical, electromechanical, mechanical, and including computer software and hardware technologies, and computer-based business methods.
		Mora range from sophisticated signal processing techniques used in state-of-the-art communication systems or in life-saving medical imaging devices to evolutionary improvements for pleasure boat applications or household appliances.
		Mora's experience further includes drafting and negotiating technology-related agreements and counseling clients in connection with issues related to patentability, patent infringement and validity.
	www.iplawfl.com /attorneys/enriquemora.htm (378 words)

	COURT OF APPEALS (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-09-17)
		A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals.
		The court noted that this was a gang-related case, extra security measures had already been taken in the case due to gang involvement, a co-defendant suggested retaliating against a witness, the likely presence of gang members in the courtroom observing the trial, and the seriousness of the charge against Matos.
		As the prospective jurors settled in for voir dire, the court informed them in a matter-of-fact manner that it was the court’s practice to refer to jurors by number.
	www.courts.state.wi.us /ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4113 (1543 words)

	Historical Calendar - Looking into Issues of Law.
		In its verdict the court states that it can be assumed that he has brought down the animal “on his allowed land and grazing land”, because he has brought the skin to the local policeman.
		In court the tax Lapps present an old letter from 1652 and the verdict of a hundred court of November 27, 1721, where it is pronounced that each settler putting out beaver nets in their waters shall be fined and pay court expenses.
		The Supreme Court in a hydro-power case declares that the Sámi communities are authorised to plead for damages for encroachment on the reindeer herding, which implements the Sámi in their legal struggle.
	www.oloft.com /history.htm (9280 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)