| |
| | Review of Ural'skie jazyki |
 | | The hesitation about the exact number of primary branches is due to the fact that while Sámi, Finnic, Mordvin, Mari, Permian, and Samoyed are beyond doubt as historical linguistic entities, with a host of common innovations in each, the same is far from true about the alleged Ugrian branch, consisting of Hungarian, Mansi, and Khanty. |
 | | Another obscure concept, viz ´conversion', seems to refer to the existence of nominal conjugation in Mordvin and Samoyed, which is not conversion, and the function of the ± sign in the columns of Ugrian languages remains obscure. |
 | | As a start, we find that contrary to the dogma of the Finnish school of historical linguists, Mordvin rather than Sámi is the branch most closely related to Finnic, a statement which in its controversiality lends support to the notion of non-binary classification of the Uralic language family. |
| www.helsinki.fi /~tasalmin/review.html (5141 words) |
|