| |
| |
Payton v. DMHAS - Ruling re: Respondent's Motion to Dismiss |
 | | Therefore, notwithstanding its designation, the respondent's motion to dismiss will be treated, where appropriate, as a motion for summary judgment and as a motion to strike. |
| | In its motion to dismiss, the respondent analyzes this case under the McDonnell Douglas paradigm. |
| | Thus, using the example in the previous paragraph, if a complaint were dismissed because of the complainant's failure to appear, the commission could initiate a complaint in its own right in lieu of maintaining the action on behalf of the complainant's (dismissed) complaint. |
| www.state.ct.us /chro/metapages/HearingOffice/HODecisions/payton_mtd.htm (2465 words) |
|
