| | [No title] |
 | | Mundelein suggests that "financial crisis affiliation," although not among the reasons listed in the manual, is another way that termination of tenure may be achieved, and that declaration of financial exigency is not required before such an affiliation. |
 | | Mundelein argues that the AAUP guidelines should be used to "fill the [m]anual's silences." This was a proper argument within the context of the remand. |
 | | Mundelein next argues that the trial court erred in ruling that the faculty manual is "an instrument in writing" that supports an award of prejudgment interest under section 2 of the Interest Act (815 ILCS 205/2 (West 1996)). |
| www.state.il.us /court/Opinions/AppellateCourt/1998/1stDistrict/May/HTML/1970605.txt (3696 words) |