| |
| | NEA v. Finley: Petitioners' Brief (Finley) |
 | | As part of the grantmaking process, the NEA inevitably looks at "past performance evaluation and other pertinent information," (9) including an applicant's prior "body of work." (10) Thus, "an artist whose work in the past might be considered 'indecent' is... |
 | | But as former NEA General Counsel Amy Sabrin candidly acknowledged, the latter terms are merely "coded language meaning, 'don't do anything too controversial.'" (26) The government's "public confidence" argument would justify refusing to fund controversial speech in any public program, for by definition supporting the expression of unpopular ideas will undermine public support. |
 | | Any artist, curator, theater producer, or publisher who thinks she might apply for an NEA grant in the future will be chilled in the art that she creates today, for fear that an NEA official's judgment that it is "indecent" or "disrespectful" will count against her in the application process. |
| www.csulb.edu /~jvancamp/doc17.html (13184 words) |
|