| | Pragmatism and the Philosophy of Language (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-08) |
 | | In the case of a natural kind term, on the other hand, both the question of which things are of that kind and the question of what it is to be that kind of thing (and so of the empirical adequacy of our theory) are questions of empirical fact. |
 | | The idea that it is possible ostensively to define a natural kind term requires the myth of the given, the idea that an object can as a matter of fact, independent of what we conceive it as, fix a principle of inclusion for things of that kind. |
 | | For, as will be argued, we can understand the empirical significance or applicability of a natural kind term to derive from the fact that a subject endorses the inferential relations that articulate the ("formal") meanings of the family of predicates to which it belongs as the inferential rules governing the correct use of those predicates. |
| csmaclab-www.cs.uchicago.edu /philosophyProject/sellars/macbeth/macbeth.html (9113 words) |