Where results make sense

About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   PR   |   Contact us

Topic: Negative and positive rights

    Note: these results are not from the primary (high quality) database.

Ads by Google

In the News (Sat 5 Dec 09)

Northern Trust

Marvin Harrison

Peter Chernin

Gary Locke

Match Play

Penelope Cruz

Mickey Rourke

AR Rahman

Danny Boyle

Hugh Jackman

[Note Part I of this outline was not used; I began with Part II:] THE FIRST ARGUMENT TO LIMIT LIBERTY FOR THE SAKE OF LIBERTY: It is necessary to limit the negative freedom of the "false" self to promote the positive freedom of the "true" (RATIONALLY AUTONOMOUS) self. THE SECOND ARGUMENT TO LIMIT LIBERTY FOR THE SAKE OF LIBERTY: It is necessary to limit negative freedom in order to guarantee to everyone some less than maximal but more than minimal sphere of equal negative freedom (i.e., a PROTECTED SPHERE OF EQUAL LIBERTY). The Problem of Promoting Positive Liberty: A State That Has the Power to Promote Positive Liberty Will Also Have the Power to Suppress Negative Liberty. faculty.washington.edu /wtalbott/phil410/intro.htm   (344 words)

Negative right - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Socialists and leftists argue that there should be no distinction between negative and positive rights, while classical liberals and libertarians believe that positive rights by their nature contravene negative rights and are therefore unacceptable. Negative rights are sometimes contrasted with positive rights, which are rights to be provided with something by the positive action of another. A negative right is a right, either moral or decreed by law, to not be subject to an action of another human being (usually abuse or coercion). en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Negative_rights   (161 words)

Contents of III. POLICY ARGUMENTS In addition, advocates of positive rights generally claim three types of benefits to including this conception of rights in constitutional law: the judiciary’s role in shaping the law through its interactions with legislatures; controlling and preventing administrative failures; and providing a remedy to the victims of callous government neglect. Negative rights advocates fear that courts will intrude on legislative discretion regarding spending priorities, or that they may order legislatures to create new services to fulfill positive rights. The policy concerns posed by the advocates of the negative rights view are merely hypothetical; because the federal judiciary has not opened the door to significant positive rights claims, none of these predicted problems have been observed. www.law.upenn.edu /conlaw/issues/vol3/num2/macnaughton/node5_ct.html   (1642 words)

Building Cathedrals Civil Rights differ from Civil Liberties in that the former is a positive action given by a government and the latter are the negative restraints placed upon a government in a bill of rights. Rights may be classified either as perfect or imperfect, depending upon their clarity and determination as opposed to one that is vague and unfixed. In constitutional law, rights are either natural, civil or political: Natural rights come from the nature of man and depend on personality; civil rights are those rights that belong to all the members of a state or country; political rights are those rights allowing people to participate in the formation and administration of government. www.angelfire.com /wa2/buildingcathedrals/rights.html   (448 words)

Agoraphilia Libertarians can thus use the language of positive and negative rights to explain how their vision builds on (though is not identical to) commonly understood conceptions of self- and world-ownership. But negative and positive rights are in fact derivative concepts: they have no particular meaning without reference to some more fundamental notion of rights, specifically, of property rights. For instance, a right to food and shelter is usually treated as a positive right, but we can cast it as a negative right if we are also willing to say that those who must provide these things do not own the labor and resources needed to do so. agoraphilia.blogspot.com /2004/06/is-square-root-of-negative-right.html   (530 words)

The Proximal Tubule Many state constitutions provide more positive rights -- two prominent examples are the right to sue in court, and in many constitutions the right to a public education. Because we did not give up the natural right to educate ourselve, improve our health, sell our employment, and save for our retirements when the Constitution was signed, the government does not have to provide these positive rights. The point is that all these postive rights that Volokh lists are positive rights the government owes us specifically because we gave up those rights for ourselves. trentmcbride.blogspot.com /2004_06_01_trentmcbride_archive.html   (2734 words)

Equalising Opportunities - The Choices of Anti-Discrimination Legislation To a considerable extent the legal disadvantages arise from the restricted capacity for the exercise of rights (the possibility and reality for the exercise of rights determined by personal circumstances and endowments, which society can ease or compensate with a ban on negative discrimination and by applying the instruments of positive discrimination). Equalising opportunities, that is, the creation of equal opportunities is a process requiring enormous innovations through which the different social and environmental systems - infrastructure, services, activities, information, documentation - become accessible for everyone, and in particular for the disabled, as a result of measures banning negative discrimination and representing positive discrimination. Positive discrimination: the provision of concessions aimed at compensating for disadvantages, or additional rights in the interest of ensuring equality of opportunities. www.independentliving.org /docs5/equalisingopps.html   (2734 words)

ProfessorBainbridge.com: My TCS Column on Reagan Eugene Volokh disagrees with Stephen Bainbridge’s TCS essay on the distinction between positive and negative rights, because as he sees it, “the terms usually refer to the right to be let alone by the government (negative rights) and the en... In this column, I discuss Reagan's legacy as a defender of negative rights, and critique Reagan's critics as purveyors of a flawed vision of positive rights. The first and highest purpose of a right to private property rights thus is a right against government takings of that property. www.professorbainbridge.com /2004/06/my_tcs_column_o.html   (1293 words)

Moral hazard and negative liberty (Signifying Nothing: Tell 'em about it, Joe-Joe!) However, political systems built around positive rights tend toward sclerosis, thereby reducing rates of economic growth, and a high rate of economic growth, along with (negative) liberty and stability, is part of the trinity of primary political goods (says me). However, I think that among the best argument for robust negative or liberty rights, i.e., for institutionalized constraints on coercion, is that a reliable system of negative rights over time creates more abilities, opens more paths of feasible possibility for individual lives, than most alternative systems of rights. Furthermore, a system of positive rights, conceived as a system of guarantees, is often self-defeating, because it cannot overcome systemic moral hazard problems that, independently of growth problems, turn out foreclose many of the possibilities for life that the system of guarantees was meant to open. blog.lordsutch.com /?entryid=2170   (373 words)

Freedom (political) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The concept of political freedom is closely allied with the concepts of civil liberties and human rights, and the fundamental idea of positive and negative freedom corresponds with the concept of positive and negative rights. "Negative freedom" may generally be defined as the absence of constraint upon an individual (see negative liberty). This kind of freedom may be referred to as a kind of negative liberty. en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Freedom_(political)   (669 words)

TCS: Tech Central Station - Reagan and Rights: Positive and Negative As the analysis thus far suggests, private property and freedom of contract are at the center of the debate over positive and negative rights. You cannot achieve positive rights of the sort Saletan likes without infringing on someone's negative rights to private property and/or freedom of contract. Reagan was a proponent of negative rights; most notably, Reagan espoused the right to be left alone. www.techcentralstation.com /060804H.html   (803 words)

Two Senses of 'Right' Positive rights are rights to some benefit that must be paid for by someone. LEGAL RIGHTS are rights that are enacted into law and enforced by an institutionalized system of adjudication and punishment. To say that there are moral rights (e.g., that everyone has a right to life) is typically to make a normative moral statement about what claims people ought to have on each other (e.g., a claim not to be killed). faculty.washington.edu /wtalbott/phil338/trdistinct.htm   (905 words)

Positive & Negative Liberties in Three Dimensions Their argument is that it costs money to enforce both kinds of rights -- negative rights at least need police and courts to enforce them -- and that taxes pay for "negative rights" just as much as for "positive rights." Therefore, they are the same thing. Hobbes, however, was an absolutist who honored nothing in the way of "positive" political liberties and who saw the sphere of civil society and negative freedom as granted and allowed entirely at the discretion of the monarch. Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) is often credited with originating the idea of negative freedom and of "civil society" (as opposed to "political society"), which is then that sphere of action free of government control in which citizens actually exercise their negative freedom. www.friesian.com /quiz.htm   (6447 words)

Articles on Gandhi The antinomies in western political theory of negative versus positive liberty and of rights versus responsibilities were evident a hundred years ago, and in England and America, democracy has long been caught in the dilemma described by Sabine: the more individual freedom and rights, the less legitimization of civic duty and economic equality. Western rights theorists, beginning with Locke, have affirmed that freedom is not "a liberty for every one to do what he lists, to live as he pleases, and not be tied by any laws," but it is freedom under law and the source of civic obligation is founded in law. When Berlin asserts that "the cardinal issue" is authority and who holds it, that "those who believe in liberty in the 'positive'-- self-directive--sense.., want it placed in their own hands," this cannot describe Gandhi's idea of freedom. www.mkgandhi.org /articles/freedom.HTM   (7053 words)

negative right - infos In a class the other day, we were discussing the notion of positive and negative rights. Negative rights are rights from certain things, usually freedoms from abuse or coercion by others, as opposed... andgt; to recognize the right placed negative sign as a number... www.angelfire.com /alt2/ang7/7/negative-right.html   (383 words)

Teens! Use Your Freedom Wisely! Negative freedom is liberty from control, from regulation, and from restraint. Positive freedom, under law and under self-restraint, is outlined in the Declaration of Independence of the United States and in the basic documents of other western countries. People acting without controls under negative freedom do so although their exercise of freedom might violate the rights of others. www.bible.ca /f-teen-freedom.htm   (1040 words)

The Perils of Positive Rights Others argue that all rights are in fact positive insofar as they are all meaningless unless they are actively protected; and the right to the protection of one’s right to freedom is a positive right, not a negative one. Positive rights have even been defended on the grounds that negative rights—of the very poor, for example—entail positive ones. If positive rights are valid, then negative rights cannot be, for the two are mutually contradictory. www.fee.org /vnews.php?nid=4915&printable=Y   (1040 words)

Rights Negative rights, such as the right to privacy, the right not to be killed, or the right to do what one wants with one's property, are rights that protect some form of human freedom or liberty,. Positive rights, therefore, are rights that provide something that people need to secure their well being, such as a right to an education, the right to food, the right to medical care, the right to housing, or the right to a job. These rights are called negative rights because such rights are a claim by one person that imposes a "negative" duty on all others—the duty not to interfere with a person's activities in a certain area. www.scu.edu /ethics/practicing/decision/rights.html   (1450 words)

Moral Rights and Civil Rights Kant's principle is often used to justify a fundamental moral right, the right to freely choose for oneself, and rights related to this fundamental right, sometimes called negative or liberty rights. Positive rights, therefore, are rights that provide something that people need to secure their well being, such as a right to an education, the right to food, the right to medical care, the right to housing, or the right to a job. Moral rights are justified by moral standards that most people acknowledge, but which are not codified in law, and therefore have been interpreted differently by different people. www.scu.edu /ethics/publications/iie/v3n1   (1237 words)

Positive Rights Positive rights are accepted at the expense of negative rights. Positive rights are not compatible with real rights, or "negative rights". Negative rights requires that no man can be forced to do anything he doesn't want. www.importanceofphilosophy.com /Bloody_PositiveRights.html   (1237 words)

Prof. Bryan Caplan Positive externalities are also often called "public goods," especially when the externalities are large relative to demand (so the equilibrium quantity is close to zero). Negative externalities are also often called "public bads," especially when the externalities are large relative to demand (so the socially optimal quantity is close to zero). Positive externalities are the other side of the coin. www.gmu.edu /departments/economics/bcaplan/e370/IO4.htm   (1237 words)

Positive & Negative Liberties in Three Dimensions Positive "welfare rights" thus are no different from positive liberties that correspond to political power in general, and they may be assimilated to that in our consideration. The problem with "welfare rights" as positive "liberties" is that, while they might enable the beneficiary to do what he wants, they must be applied by the threat or the use of force against the freedom and/or property of others. Hobbes, however, was an absolutist who honored nothing in the way of "positive" political liberties and who saw the sphere of civil society and negative freedom as granted and allowed entirely at the discretion of the monarch. www.friesian.com /quiz.htm   (6448 words)

Wrong Rights The decision to push for economic and social “rights” raises the long-time controversy concerning so-called positive and negative rights. Positive rights and negative rights are mutually exclusive. We are about to witness the launch of a global movement to establish “economic and social rights” on a par with “human rights.” In other words, say the organizers of this movement, the right to food and health care is as legitimate as the right not to be tortured by one’s government. www.fff.org /freedom/fd0202c.asp   (1380 words)

Positive Positive right Positive rights are negative rights which are the rights from certain things, usually freedoms from abuse... Coalition for Positive Sexuality The Coalition for Positive Sexuality (CPS) is a self-described "Queer Nation and others... Positive-definite matrix In Hermitian matrix M is said to be positive definite if it has one (and therefore all) of the... www.brainyencyclopedia.com /topics/positive.html   (465 words)

Positive science - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Examples are positive and negative rights, or positive and negative liberty. The term positive lies at the heart of one of the major epistemological debates in the humanities and social sciences. In the humanities and social sciences, the term positive is used in a number of ways. en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Positive_science   (465 words)

Teens! Use Your Freedom Wisely! Positive freedom, under law and under self-restraint, is outlined in the Declaration of Independence of the United States and in the basic documents of other western countries. Positive freedom is liberty to become and to do as we should. People acting without controls under negative freedom do so although their exercise of freedom might violate the rights of others. www.bible.ca /f-teen-freedom.htm   (1040 words)

Rights Where negative rights are "negative" in the sense that they claim for each person a zone of non-interference from others, positive rights are "positive" in the sense that they claim for each person the positive assistance of others in fulfilling basic constituents of human well-being like health and education. Positive rights, therefore, are rights that provide something that people need to secure their well being, such as a right to an education, the right to food, the right to medical care, the right to housing, or the right to a job. Positive rights impose a positive duty on us—the duty actively to help a person to have or to do something. www.scu.edu /Ethics/practicing/decision/rights.html   (1040 words)

Democracy, Metaphors and Freedom: Teaching American Government While assumption (4) advocates negative freedom, assumption (1) criticizes positive freedom: the masses would regulate private behavior because they are intolerant, and they would regulate economic activity because they are selfish. This relationship exists across gender; that is, men prefer negative freedom more than women do (Shapiro and Mahajan 1986). Under this definition of freedom, one is only free if the government puts criminals in jail, ensures clean air and water, maintains a minimum wage and economic safety nets, provides education, etc. Positive freedom thus requires bigger government. faculty.mckendree.edu /brian_frederking/papers/teach.htm   (4861 words)

Positive & Negative Liberties in Three Dimensions Positive "welfare rights" thus are no different from positive liberties that correspond to political power in general, and they may be assimilated to that in our consideration. The problem with "welfare rights" as positive "liberties" is that, while they might enable the beneficiary to do what he wants, they must be applied by the threat or the use of force against the freedom and/or property of others. Hobbes, however, was an absolutist who honored nothing in the way of "positive" political liberties and who saw the sphere of civil society and negative freedom as granted and allowed entirely at the discretion of the monarch. www.friesian.com /quiz.htm   (6447 words)

Human rights - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Human rights are typically divided into two categories: negative human rights (rights to be free from) and positive human rights (rights to), although other categorizations exist. Positive rights have been codified in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in many 20th-century constitutions. Rights may also be non-derogable (not limited in times of national emergency); these often include the right to life, the right to be prosecuted only according to the laws that are in existence at the time of the offense, the right to be free from slavery, and the right to be free from torture. en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Human_rights   (6447 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   Press   |   Contact us   Copyright © 2005-2007 www.factbites.com Usage implies agreement with terms.