| |
| | Nevirapine Versus Efavirenz: The 2NN Study (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-03) |
 | | Of note, this difference was largely attributable to a high frequency of early discontinuations in the indinavir arm of the study, even in the absence of documented adverse effects. Despite this important limitation of the study, efavirenz emerged as a new and attractive NNRTI option. |
 | | Total daily doses of efavirenz and nevirapine in the single NNRTI arms of the study were as currently recommended. The nevirapine arms of the study incorporated a dose escalation from 200 mg daily to 400 mg daily on day 14, as per current standard of practice. |
 | | Finally, nevirapine has a definitive advantage in terms of price. Based on the results of the 2NN Study, the choice between nevirapine and efavirenz in the clinic will most likely be driven by a combination of factors, primarily including the individual patients characteristics (i.e., co-morbidities, and cardiovascular risk), as well as cost. |
| www.hivandhepatitis.com /recent/nnrtis/022403a.html (1468 words) |
|