| | Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2001.10.06 (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-24) |
 | | One example of the book's confusion and errors must be given. |
 | | On pages 63-4, Parisinou states "The famous tablet (pinax) of Ninnion and 4.25 (both dated to the first half of the fourth century; Pl. 17) depict a youthful long-haired male figure..." However, catalog item 4.25 and Plate 17 are both the tablet of Ninnion; there is only one piece of evidence here, not two. |
 | | Mistakes like this, and they are too common, must inevitably undermine the reader's faith in all the other evidence presented. |
| ccat.sas.upenn.edu /bmcr/2001/2001-10-06.html (1133 words) |