| |
| | Re: nullary function syntax (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-04) |
 | | OK, I know I'm late into this (things have been unsettled here --- big difference, I know), but: Peter Ashenden writes: In the Usage Guide, there are several uses of nullary functions, eg, <* 3+2 *> == 5 I guess the general form is intended to be <* expression *>. |
 | | For example, is the phrase <* (x :: T1) :: T2 *> a nullary function value (read as "x contained in T1, and the result contained in T2"), or a function type signature (read as "the type of functions that map from T1 to T2"). |
 | | For a nullary function, the signature includes an empty parameter list and the return type. |
| www.ittc.ku.edu /~majord/rosetta/200110/msg00024.html (279 words) |
|