| |
| | Shannon/Nyquist Sampling and Reconstruction Theorem |
 | | if the former, things like the sampling theorem should be nearly trivial for guys like you with brains the size of small planets. |
 | | if not, and you feel obliged to be truly mathematically rigorous with the dirac-delta function, then, maybe you're right, the sampling theorem would be pretty hard to do. |
 | | In general, Shannon 1948 is astonishingly clear (even > fifty years on, in many ways it is still the best short introduction to > his information theory), but the "proofs" in this paper tend toward the > heuristic rather than the rigorous. |
| www.lns.cornell.edu /spr/2002-08/msg0043466.html |
|