| |
| | OSCN Found Document:DeLozier v. State |
 | | Second, it must be established that the consistent statement was made prior to the time when there was a motive for the witness to lie or there was an exercise of improper influence." quoting 1 L. Whinery, Guide to the Oklahoma Evidence Code 263 (1985). |
 | | Arizona, 497 U.S., 654, 110 S.Ct. 3047, 3057, 111 L.Ed.2d 511 (1990) ("as we held in Clemons v. |
 | | State, 1994 OK CR 43, ¶16, 876 P.2d 707, 713 (sub-proposition F) ¶36 In propositions ten, eleven and twelve DeLozier argues that there was insufficient evidence to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, the three aggravating circumstances. |
| www.oscn.net /applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?citeID=60694 (6481 words) |
|