| |
| | 24 Wn.2d 819, NICK BILL et .al., Respondents, v. VICTOR GATTAVARA et al., Appellants |
 | | We now come to the testimony of Jim Hailstone, called as a witness by respondents, and we may say that, while Hailstone was a defendant in the action, he did not appear in the lower court, other than as a witness, and is not an appellant. |
 | | Hailstone further testified on cross-examination that he, Martin Schroeder, and Hailstone's son had entire charge of the logging operations; that he was hook tender and head loader, Schroeder operated the donkey, and Don Hailstone helped his father. |
 | | Hailstone, Don Hailstone, and Martin Schroeder, were agents or employees of either Gattavara or Garner, but were, in fact, independent contractors and acting in such capacity under an agreement with Garner. |
| www.mrsc.org /mc/courts/supreme/024wn2d/024wn2d0819.htm (5412 words) |
|