| |
| | I am Joe's Explanatory Gap |
 | | Whereas with sensing redly and process squiggle-squiggle, it is conceivable both that sensing redly not be identical with process squiggle-squiggle, and--more importantly--that even if you take the physical story P as a premise, it is perfectly conceivable that process squiggle-squiggle be a process of sensing greenly, and not redly. |
 | | There is nothing particular about process squiggle-squiggle, or about neural processes that are similar to squiggle-squiggle, or about sensing greenly, or about hues similar to green, which explains why sensing greenly should be identical with process squiggle-squiggle, instead of some other squoggle-squoggle. |
 | | There is nothing in the concept of red or in the neighborhood of red, or in squiggle-squiggle or neural processes similar to squiggle-squiggle, which serves to explain the identity of sensing redly with process squiggle-squiggle. |
| vm.uconn.edu /~wwwphil/pgap.html (13128 words) |
|