| |
| | REGULATIONS REVIEW IN THE NEW ZEALAND PARLIAMENT - [2004] MqLJ 2; (2004) 4 Macquarie Law Journal 7 |
 | | Parliament, therefore, was not always aware as to which regulations have been promulgated, nor was it always in a position to pronounce judgment on the instrument in question. |
 | | In contrast, the only regular form of scrutiny within the New Zealand Parliament was the practice, lasting from 1949 until 1957, of having the Attorney-General vet all draft regulations, paying attention to their drafting, form and content, and the scrutiny of important regulations by the governing party caucus. |
 | | To ensure Parliament retained ultimate control over changes made to the schedules, regulations that made new drugs illegal, as well as those that reclassified drugs that were already illegal, would have to be approved by a resolution of the House before coming into effect. |
| www.austlii.edu.au /au/journals/MqLJ/2004/2.html (11179 words) |
|