| | [No title] (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-29) |
 | | The only difference between task 1 and task 2 is that subjects have to "hold" the noun phrase the juice in a memory buffer longer in task 1 than in task 2. |
 | | As shown in Figure 1, the only region that was significantly more active in task 1 than task 2 was part of Broca's area (the pars opercularis, p <.008), suggesting that this region is the site of the memory buffer used to process sentences with filler-gap relationships. |
 | | In task 3, subjects judged acceptable center-embedded and right-branching sentences, and structurally identical sentences that were unacceptable because they contained a pseudo-word (e.g., the center-embedded sentence *The juice that the child mulved stained the rug and the right-branching sentence *The child spilled the juice that mulved the rug.). |
| ruccs.rutgers.edu /~karin/neuroling.html (317 words) |