
	Where results make sense

Topic: Peerreview

Related Topics

Physical Review

Code review

Preprint

Academic publishing

Scientific journal

Scientific research

Software inspection

Scientific literature

Editor

Nature (journal)

Scientific fraud

Annalen der Physik

Scientific method

Falsifiability

Refactoring

	Meatball Wiki: CommunityProgrammableWikiIssues (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-05)
		PeerReview would alleviate this risk, provided the community has a suitable number of technically trained people reading over the changes.
		A problem with any PeerReview system is that it makes it impossible to do anything quickly; one would basically have to debug a proposed change oneself because of the FileReplacement lag.
		PeerReview is not sufficient protection for a CommunityProgrammableWiki, because any sufficiently reflective SPW would be able to have the very peer review mechanisms themselves edited -- and potentially removed or subverted.
	www.usemod.com /cgi-bin/mb.pl?CommunityProgrammableWikiIssues (1398 words)

	CommunityWiki: ChangeFailure
		I think you bring up an interesting point: PeerReview can limit the opportunity for a ChangeFailure, by nipping a problem in the butt early on.
		PeerReview limits ChangeFailure, by applying the community's wisdom to a problem.
		PeerReview also acts as a ColdBlanket if applied too early, so it also slows change.
	www.communitywiki.org /en/ChangeFailure (3219 words)

	Slow Web Performance Kills eBusiness
		Their methods are similar to wind tunnels that engineers use to test new airplane designs - but no amount of simulated testing can predict what will happen when a plane takes flight for the first time.
		Porivo's testing network includes all types of user profiles - from consumer dialup connections, to DSL and Cable Modems, to corporate T1/T3s, and it examines all of the key factors that affect performance: ISP backbone conditions, DNS lookup, connect/redirect time, first byte time, content download time, and network/server errors.
		And because peerReview is a hosted service, there's no software to install...
	www.enterpriseecommerce.com /2002/0604.html (456 words)

	[No title]
		peerreview is like % journal mode, but provides for a single-column "cover" title page for % anonymous peer review.
		peerreviewca is like % peerreview, but allows the author names to be entered and formatted % as with conference mode so that author affiliation and contact % information can be easily seen on the cover page.
		% peerreviewca is like peerreview, but allows the author names to be % entered and formatted as under conference mode so that author % affiliations and contact information can be easily seen on the cover % page.
	www.ctan.org /tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/IEEEtran/IEEEtran.cls (7071 words)

	Meatball Wiki: PeerReview (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-05)
		PeerReview consists of two parts, the PeerPart and the ReviewPart.
		This is in my opinion given short shrift here, and is a large part of what I've been trying to address with systems such as the ScoopEngine.
		One technical option to ensure the community is being diligent with PeerReview is to ensure each edited page was matched with at least one non-author view.
	www.usemod.com /cgi-bin/mb.pl?PeerReview (375 words)

	CAIDA : tools : taxonomy
		PeerReview gathers and reports a complete range of measurements -- DNS lookup, first byte and content download time, errors, network latencies and backbones crossed.
		The PeerReview web interface enables users to identify trends in the performance of their web site or their competitors' sites, examing how their site compares to sites of industry leaders.
		Also, PeerReview's error code reporting function allows users to see the types of errors their customers experience, such as "page not found" errors, missing objects, and other HTTP and network errors.
	www.caida.org /tools/taxonomy/perf2taxonomy.xml (2426 words)

	ISP-Planet - Equipment - End-to-End Web Performance Testing
		Porivo Technologies, a provider of end-to-end Web performance testing products, announced the launch of peerReview Transaction, a service that measures the speed of complete, multi-page user sequences from the edge of the network and is designed to capture the latencies introduced in the "last mile" of the Internet.
		By measuring the speed of these simulated transactions, peerReview Transaction provides an ISP with an indication of performance visibility across the "last mile," all the way to the user's desktop.
		peerReview Transaction is an extension of Porivo's core peerReview product, which allows companies to evaluate the speed of their websites.
	www.isp-planet.com /equipment/2001/porivo_monitor.html (507 words)

	ITworld.com - Peering into performance testing
		That’s my reaction to a new service called peerReview to be offered by Porivo Technologies (http://www.porivo.com/).
		PeerReview is a system for measuring and monitoring Web-site performance from the end user’s perspective.
		The neat technique Porivo uses is to have real end users run the peerReview client software (called Porivo PEER) – a Java-based application that runs in the background (rather like the SETI@home system; http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ can).
	www.itworld.com /Net/3598/NWW00450974 (369 words)

	Refactor As You Go (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-05)
		I think the only thing we have is group ownership which suggests that even if we don't want to be UsingSignatures, we at least can't be too attached to what we write.
		PeerReview simply means that your peers will review your actions.
		It is in this sense that I mean PeerReview.
	c2.com /cgi/wiki?RefactorAsYouGo (252 words)

	Peer Review (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-05)
		PairProgramming is designed to be as effective as PeerReview but faster and more fun.
		A special case of PeerReview is giving EditHints as done by a FriendlyPeerContributor.
		To be able to detect errors, one must be intimately familiar with the problem to be addressed.
	c2.com /cgi/wiki?PeerReview (413 words)

	PeerReview - GreenSocs (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-05)
		The package developer may request that a package be moved from Unstable into the Testing distribution.
		At that point a PeerReview process will be started.
		For a package to be moved into Stable, it must have passed the PeerReview process.
	www.greensocs.com /PeerReview (1053 words)

	Peering into performance testing
		Sign up to receive this and other networking newsletters in your inbox.
		That's my reaction to a new service called peerReview to be offered by Porivo Technologies (www.porivo.com/).
		The neat technique Porivo uses is to have real end users run the peerReview client software (called Porivo PEER) — a Java-based application that runs in the background (rather like the SETI@home system; setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ can).
	www.networkworld.com /newsletters/web/2001/00450974.html (447 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)