| |
| | Penn Central |
 | | As in the Penn Central case, the attorney for Euclid argued that zoning was needed to preserve the character of the village. |
 | | Penn Central attorneys made this point, saying that Euclid turned on protecting "health, safety, morals, and general welfare," while the Penn Central case was based solely on aesthetics, which are in the eyes of the beholders. |
 | | Penn Central opened the door for downzoning such as that found in rural Oregon, where no one is allowed to build a house on their own land unless they own 160 acres and, if it is farm land, actually earn (depending on soil productivity) $40,000 to $80,000 a year farming it. |
| www.ti.org /vaupdate38.html (1121 words) |
|