| |
| | Poetry Life and Times, Vallance Review No. 53, January 2006 (Site not responding. Last check: ) |
 | | Considerably richer late twentieth century and early twenty-first century metric theories, however diverse and contradictory, have abounded, and are beginning to expose the glaring deficiencies of traditional iambic pentameter theory in its attempts, however elegant and persuasive, to explain away the sonnet's superficial rhythmic structure. |
 | | While iambic pentameter adequately accounts for the basic rhythmic structure of most sonnets (though scarcely all, by any means), it does not address certain fundamental and frequently contradictory or paradoxical variances which crop up with astounding frequency in thousands upon thousands of famous sonnets. |
 | | This is a good thing, since consistently regular iambic pentameter is sooner or later bound to degenerate into a brittle foxtrot or worse yet, numbing dogtrot rhythmic beat, leaving the listener with the distinct impression he or she is listening to a poem which sounds uncannily like a kettle drum when recited. |
| poetrylifeandtimes.com /valrevw53.htm (4162 words) |
|