| |
| | In re Lock Revocable Living Trust (Site not responding. Last check: ) |
 | | Appellants essentially contend that the plain and unambiguous language of the Trust dictates a per stirpes distribution, discussed infra, and, thus, the trial court erred in (1) concluding that the language of the Trust was ambiguous and (2) considering extrinsic evidence of Annie Lock's intent. |
 | | On the one hand, "per stirpes" means that an estate is to be divided into as many equal shares as there are siblings, whether surviving or deceased, of a decedent. |
 | | Hence, "per stirpes" is in conflict with the remainder of the provision, that directs Annie Lock's estate to be distributed "to my then living brothers and sisters in equal shares," to those siblings who are living at the time of Annie Lock's death. |
| www.hawaii.gov /jud/opinions/sct/2005/25214.htm (4498 words) |
|