| |
| | The Chronicle: Colloquy Live Transcript |
 | | Perestroika," a pseudonymous member, or members, of the political-science profession, set off a protest movement a year ago, arguing that scholars with mathematical approaches dominate the discipline and that the American Political Science Association and its flagship journal are too rigid and support only certain kinds of research and scholars. |
 | | First, this question implies that the Perestroika movement makes sense only if it is seeking to replace one paradigm with another, if it is a "unified movement." But the shared goal is to create space for a wide variety of kinds of political inquiry to flourish. |
 | | There is no single unified Perestroika critique, but one can obtain from the Perestroika web site copies both of Greg Kasza's statement of Perestroikan objectives, which was widely endorsed by Perestroika participants, and the letter I drafted last year which summarizes many of the concerns that many Perestroikans had up to that point. |
| chronicle.com /colloquylive/2001/09/perestroika (4091 words) |
|