| | Phimosis in antiquity |
 | | Phimosis has, accordingly, been described as a foreskin that is "too long" (hypertrophic phimosis), a foreskin whose orifice is not as expandable as the foreskin of most adults (often called "true" phimosis), or a foreskin that has not yet completed the developmental process of physiological detachment from the glans (congenital phimosis). |
 | | In contrast to the nineteenth-century conceptualisation of phimosis, which is predicated upon an alleged universality and defined purely in terms of a misunderstanding of preputial development and a biased view of penile morphology, the conception of phimosis in antiquity was based on rarity and on clinically verifiable histological pathology. |
 | | The nineteenth-century conceptualisation of phimosis was predicated on the pathologisation of the three defining characteristics of the juvenile foreskin: physiological preputial nonretractability; physiological balanopreputial attachment, and generous length of the acroposthion. |
| www.foreskin.org /phi-fh.htm (2809 words) |