| |
| | Spelling reform idea. | Antimoon Forum |
 | | One important note, though, is that the grapheme may represent multiple different phonemes, based on context and like; it is not ambiguous in its usage, but rather one just has to understand a number of rules that determine how /s/ and /z/ are to be represented. |
 | | Of that, the only part that was not compromisable is that, for the targeted phoneme inventory and distribution, it would be purely phonemic, and could represent any possible target phoneme in any place where it could occur in theory in the first place. |
 | | Other splits which are actually non-marginally phonemic, though, would be harder to handle, definitely moreso than "splits" that are only at the realization level and still moreso than mergers, which can be handled by simply trying to represent as many historical distinctions as possible even if many only have a limited portion of them. |
| www.antimoon.com /forum/t246-60.htm (2049 words) |
|