| |
| | Does "Language" equal "Human Language?" (1) |
 | | Phonosemantics is less clearly accepted by mainstream workers except as marginalia (a mistake if one is familiar with many African, Central Asian, Southeast Asian languages, etc.), and even here, there are usually only hints of higher-order structural motivation (such as Nichols' 30-year old article on feature-level associations with augmentative/diminutive sound symbolism). |
 | | Chewing effectively requires feedback routines which allow one to retrace to earlier steps- sometimes you miss pieces, or the structure of food is such that one runs into a similar hierarchical organization pattern- hard skin, flesh, seed sheath, seed, etc. Possibly the basis of syntax lies in these routines. |
 | | The phonosemantics behind the lexicon (abstracting away history and grammaticalization and all the rest) appears to be exactly based in the cardinal points of the various cycles- the properties of food to be processed at each of the different tooth types, the actions needed to achieve that processing, and on and on. |
| www.enformy.com /dma-an1.htm (3052 words) |
|