| |
| | [No title] |
 | | Pierre claimed that he was the original owner of the transmitter, had sold it to an individual he could identify only as ``Jean Louis,'' but could provide no evidence of the transaction, or a phone number, address or even the existence of a ``Jean Louis.'' Mr. |
 | | Pierre claimed that he was ``not operating an illegal station as stated,'' that the agents had the opportunity to inspect the premises and were ``given the name of the owner of the device in question which did not have anything to do with me.'' Mr. |
 | | Pierre's response, Section 503(b) of the Act requires that the Commission take into account the nature, circumstances, extent and gravity of the violation and, with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and such other matters as justice may require.6 9. |
| www.fcc.gov /eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3154A1.html (1426 words) |
|