| | [No title] (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-08) |
 | | As the cardiologist's opinion opposes rather than supports the veteran's claim that his hypertension is due to his service-connected pleural cavity injury, the evidence is not probative of his claim and therefore, does not constitute new and material evidence. |
 | | Furthermore, the veteran's assertion alone that his service-connected pleural cavity injury caused hypertension is not probative of his claim as a lay witness is not capable of offering competent evidence that requires medical knowledge. |
 | | An Increased Rating for Pleural Cavity Injury Background The service medical records disclose that, in April 1967, the veteran was in Vietnam, destroying enemy bunkers with explosives, when a fragment from a trigger grenade hit him in the left chest resulting in a hemopneumothorax. |
| www.va.gov /vetapp/files1/9404151.txt (2596 words) |