| |
| | Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2000.04.17 |
 | | Keyt directs his commentary much more toward the sort of readers/listeners that Aristotle really seems to have had in mind, his students and colleagues at the Peripatos, who studied and discussed politics as a set of problems not unlike many others, such as in poetics, rhetoric, ethics, or even metaphysics, which they studied. |
 | | Keyt starts by correcting his own translation -- the aporia is a problem, not a puzzle and goes on to detail why Aristotle's solution to the problem, which entails seeking out the rarer of the qualities with regard to each office, is no solution to the problem he has stated. |
 | | Keyt very helpfully explains that Aristotle's "solution" amounts more to a principle of searching rather than of selection and that, despite the exclusivity of qualities stated in his aporia, Aristotle assumes their overlap in his solution. |
| ccat.sas.upenn.edu /bmcr/2000/2000-04-17.html (4244 words) |
|