| |
| | The Prehistoric Society - Book Review |
 | | He eschews the positivism and ecological determinism of processual archaeology, as well as the extreme relativism and idealism, which he attributes to post-processual archaeology. |
 | | For instance, processual archaeology, he suggests, is more suited to studying subsistence strategies and settlement patterns, whereas post-processual hermeneutic approaches are more relevant to studying symbolism, ideology or religion. |
 | | Furthermore, he is at pains to emphasise that, in his opinion, some aspects of human societies, notably in the domain of culture and meaning, are beyond the reach of archaeological interpretation in the absence of written records. |
| www.ucl.ac.uk /prehistoric/reviews/04_09_trigger.htm (725 words) |
|